Answer:
Probably not, because the terms are not definite.
Explanation:
A contract is considered to be valid when there is a written or expressed agreement for one party to deliver goods or services to another.
The terms are clearly stated. For example the price, time of sale, acceptance of price, and so on.
A valid contract has the following elements: offer, acceptance, agreement, and consideration.
In the given scenario where Kelly tells Matthew that she will sell him one of her motorcycles at some time in the future and Matthew eagerly accepts. There is an agreement but there is no specific offer and consideration of price and also the time of transaction.
So the contract is probably not valid because terms are not clearly defined.
Answer:
Cost of goods manufactured 655,900
Explanation:
<em>First, we add the three cost component:</em>
materials used in production 62,100
direct labor 198,200
overhead 403,100
total cost added during the period 663,400
<em>Then, using the WIP beginning and ending figures, we solve for cost of goods manufactured</em>
WIP january 1st 187,500
cost added 663,400
WP endind <u> (195,000) </u>
Cost of goods manufactured 655,900
The answer is material math error.
An adjusting entry is essentially a bookkeeping modification that improves the accuracy of the financial statements by reflecting the revenue and spending on an accrual basis, which is typically but not always the case. At the conclusion of the accounting period, adjustments are made. This might happen towards the end of the month or at the end of the year.
Prior period adjustments are errors or mistakes committed in the prior reporting period. These mistakes must be remedied or eliminated by taking suitable corrective action. Prior period items include factual errors, arithmetic errors, and errors in applying accounting rules.
Therefore, material math error is the correct option.
To know more about adjustment to financial statements click here:
brainly.com/question/24178504
#SPJ4
Answer:
Option (B) is correct.
Explanation:
The utility maximization point for a consumer is as follows:
It is given that,
price of Pepsi(x) = $1 per can
price of a hamburger(y) = $2
Marginal utility from Pepsi = 4
Marginal utility from hamburgers = 6
Hence,
4 > 3
Therefore, it can be seen that the consumer's utility is not maximized at this point.
Law of diminishing marginal utility states that as the consumer consumes more and more quantity of goods then as a result the utility obtained from the consumption goes on diminishing.
So, there is a need to increase the quantity of Pepsi consumed and reducing the quantity of hamburgers consumed.
