Answer:
Sunk-cost fallacy.
Explanation:
The sunk-cost fallacy refers to the behavior done by the individuals when they continue such behavior because they already invested resources on it (time, money, effort).
In this example, <u>Les invested money on the megaphone of root beer,</u> he starts drinking it but <u>he becomes full, nevertheless he keeps drinking it </u>(even when his friend tells him he will get sick) <u>because he "bought it and not going to waste one drop of it"</u>
<u>Less continues drinking the root beer even though he's already full because he thinks he already invested money on buying it.</u>
Thus, this is an example of the sunk-cost fallacy.
Answer:
B. Giving up
Explanation:
Giving up means not making further attempt in an event. It is a state of surrendering to challenges one is facing after standing up to it for a while. Such is the case of Adrian.
The result is not unusual since the probability that p is
equal to or more extreme than the sample proportion is greater than 5% (153/300
= 0.51). Thus, it is not unusual for a wrong call to be made in an election if
exit polling alone is considered.
Answer: South Korea
Explanation:
Imports and export to South Korea amount to about $535 billion and $605 billion compared to 0.2 billion for imports and for exports in North Korea.
