Answer:
O. Makes it possible for candidates to lose the popular vote, yet win the elections
Explanation:
In the Electoral College Voting, found in the US Election, it is a system whereby the winner of the popular votes in a given state takes all the electoral college vote found in that state. Some state has higher college votes than others.
Due to unequal college votes across the country, it is possible for the total popular votes cast for a candidate to be higher while the other candidate wins the election through massive election college votes gotten. A typical election scenario is between Hillary Clinton and Trump in 2016.
It has changed people who used to be nice people into bad
<em>Answer: In economics, the law of increasing costs is a principle that states that to produce an increasing amount of a good a supplier must give up greater and greater amounts of another good. ... If the economy is at the maximum for all inputs, then the cost of each unit will be more expensive.</em>
Answer:
In this scenario, a representative democracy would be best.
Explanation:
In this situation where the head of state has been engaging in corruption it would be good to have a representative democracy or what is sometimes called indirect democracy. In this kind of government people vote for their leaders and they are charged with representing them. The laws in society are therefore representative of the people and the representatives can vote on whether to remove the leader ahead of his term or whether some other sanction is appropriate. There are checks and balances in this kind of system that assures the executive does not gain too much power. It is also unlikely this leader will be voted in for a third term given his corrupt practices.
<span>The move over law applies not only to police and fire vehicles but also to </span>tow trucks.
