Answer:
Payment of more interest in future and extension in the term of debt
Explanation:
Credit cards refer to plastic money.Such cards grant the holder the facility to withdraw and make payments greater than their balance of money in the account. Credit cards grant liquidity to the holder but at the same time, the holder is required to pay interest if the money drawn in excess is not paid back to the issuer within a stipulated time.
Minimum balance payment refers to that threshold limit of payment required which keeps the credit card and credit limit operational.
Paying a minimum balance eliminates late fee but interest will have to be paid on the balance remaining outstanding. So gradually, as one keeps paying only the minimum balance, the amount remaining unpaid would rise and thus, the interest to be paid on such outstanding amount shall rise too.
Also, with increasing outstanding dues, the debt term i.e the period by which the holder pays off the entire money due along with interest, will extend. So minimum balance payment may save funds initially, but has adverse long term implications.
Answer:
$208,000
Explanation:
Calculation for fixed overhead applied
Using this formula
Fixed overhead applied =Budgeted Fixed overhead+Fixed overhead volume variance
Let plug in the formula
Fixed overhead applied =$200,000+$8,000
Fixed overhead applied=$208,000
Therefore Fixed overhead applied must be $208,000
Answer:
The answer is $41.21
Explanation:
Required Rate of Return = Risk Free Rate + Beta*(Market Risk Premium)= 5.2% + 0.9 * 6% = 10.6%
Cost of Equity = D1/Current Stock Price + Growth Rate
10.6% = $3/$40 +g
g = 3.1%
Stock Price After 3 Years = Current Stock Price*Growth Rate= $40 * (1.031)= $41.21
<span>Both of these examples are illustrative of the "behavior" element of the assertive message format. These example are objective in that they only outlined what happened in a given situation. Although the second may appear to have an emotional connotation, it simply gives an objective impression of what happened.</span>
RULE 1.7 CONFLICT OF INTEREST: CURRENT CLIENTS
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if:
(1) the representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client; or
(2) the representation of one or more clients may be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client, or a third person, or by a personal interest of the lawyer.
(b) Notwithstanding the existence of a concurrent conflict of interest under paragraph (a), a lawyer may represent a client if:
(1) the lawyer reasonably believes that the lawyer will be able to provide competent and diligent representation to each affected client;
(2) the representation is not prohibited by law;
(3) the representation does not involve the assertion of a claim by one client against another client represented by the lawyer in the same litigation or other proceeding before a tribunal; and
(4) each affected client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing.
