All categories

3 years ago

How taxation and legislation impact positively and negatively on a company?

1 answer:

wel3 years ago

6 0

Positive : Taxation could be used to exclude some expenses that could be putted in the income statement

Negative : Taxation will cut out some part of the company's annual revenue

hope this helps

You might be interested in

Of course, these engineering controls will cost $33,000 dollars. This is compared to a continuing hearing conservation program t

ra1l [238]

Answer:

Explanation:

As the loan amount is gradually written off by the cost saved , the interest saved is also considered

P= ( 1+ R)^n

F = 9,000

R = 5% , 0.05

Loan amount - $33,000

N=Number of years

Year 1 = 9000( 1+0.05)^-1= 8,571.43

Year 2 =9000(1+0.05)^-2 = 8,163.27= 16.734.70

Year 3= 9000(1+0.05)^-3= 7,774.54 = 24,509.24

Year 4 = 9,000(1+0.05)^-4= 7,404.32= 31,913.56

Year 5 = 9,000 (1+0.05)^-5= 7,051.74= 38,965.3

Payback period is 5 years.

The company has the option of $33,000 for a control that will be repaid over five years period or a continuing hearing conservation program that would have paid ($9,000*5) $45,000 for the five years.

Comparing the two option , The Engineering control is a cheaper option and even with benefits that will outlast the continuing hearing program.

8 0

3 years ago

A company reported net income of $290,000. Beginning balances in Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable were $18,000 and $21,0

NikAS [45]

Answer:

$310,500

Explanation:

The first step is to calculste the increase in account payable

= ending amount-beginning balance

= $29,000-$11,500

= $17,500

Decrease in account receivable

= $21,000-$18,000

= $3,000

Therefore the cash flow can be calculated as follows

= $290,000 + $17,500 + $3000

= $310,500

8 0

3 years ago

Rick prepared financial statements for MegaCorp knowing that it was going to use his statements to apply for a loan with Big Ban

Ymorist [56]

Answer:

The correct answer is the option D: Both the foreseeable doctrine and the restatement doctrine.

Explanation:

On the one hand, the <em>foreseeable doctrine</em> dictates that there is a limit in the liability of party for those acts that he has done and that carry a risk of foreseeable harm. Therefore that this point of view establishes that a reasonable person would be able to understand and so to know when a certain action would bring certain damages to another party.

On the oher hand, the <em>restatement doctrine</em> establishes that there are a set of treatises on legal subjects that primarily are looking for to inform judges and lawyers about general principles of common law. And therefore that those treatises will help both the judge and the lawyers at the time of the trial when the person has to go to court.

3 0

3 years ago

Social Security benefits are increased each year in proportion to the increase in the CPI, even though most economists believe t

erik [133]

Answer:

False The statement does not correlate

5 0

3 years ago

U. S. Personal savings fell significantly during the 1980s and 1990s. Why didn’t the supply of loanable funds experience a simil

Wewaii [24]

Answer:

Increased foreign wealth and income

Explanation:

5 0

2 years ago