Answer:
<em>earn</em><em> </em><em>.</em><em> </em>
<em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em>
<em>He</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>not</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em> </em><em>skilled </em><em>worker</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>He</em><em> </em><em>doesn't </em><em>earn</em><em> </em><em>much</em><em>.</em>
B) did not acquire the instrument in good faith
Answer:
It is preferable to further process Product A.
Explanation:
Product should be processed further before sale if the net incremental benefits from further processing is positive.
The net incremental benefits from further processing is increase in revenue when further processed less further costs of processing.
Increase in revenue=$58,000-$40,000
=$18,000
Further processing costs=$15,000
Net incremental benefits=$18,000-$15,000
Net incremental benefits=$3,000
Since processing further brings a net benefit of $3,000, Product A should be further processed before being sold.
Answer: False
Explanation:
Classification shifting is a method used whereby the core earnings are manipulated by misclassifying the items in the income statement.
One way that managers make use of classification shifting is by reporting the operating expenses for the business as nonoperating expenses. This is usually done in order to inflate the operating income.
The statement in the question is false as classification shifting by managers doesn't lead to under-reporting of total expenses and over-statement of bottom-line net income rather it lead to over reporting.