1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alex Ar [27]
4 years ago
9

A company has decided that it no longer needs to extensively count and inspect the products it buys from a particular supplier.

This suggests that the buying company has is in the volume consolidation stage of developing procurement strategy.A) TrueB) False
Business
1 answer:
Aleksandr-060686 [28]4 years ago
3 0

Answer: False

             

Explanation: Under the volume consolidation stage the organisation reduces it suppliers for the procurement of raw materials and tries to increase its negotiation strength.

In the given case, company is no longer worries about the quality and quantity the materials they are receiving. There is nothing mentioned about the negotiation or reduction of number of suppliers.

Hence we can conclude that the given statement is false.

You might be interested in
Problems and applications q7 for any given demand curve for the right to pollute, the government can achieve the same outcome ei
Bas_tet [7]
We answer this question by bringing about the following supposition:
<span>The corrective tax policy and the number of pollution permits available do not change in spite of this demand shift.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
RuthAnn is 28 years old and is retiring at the age of 65. When she retires, she estimates that she will need an annual income of
inessss [21]

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

From her current age of 28 to her retirement age of 65, RuthAnn has (65 - 28 =) 37 more years to work.

If she saves 11% of her annual income of $36,278.13 into a 401(k), she will be setting aside (11% * 36,278.13 =) $3,990.59 into the 401(k) account annually.

At 7.1% compounding rate, in 37 years, RuthAnn would have set aside an amount estimated by the future value of an annuity formula.

FV = \frac{A(1+r)^{n} - 1}{r}

where FV is the future value, the amount that would have been set aside,

A = is the annual savings,

r = is the compounding rate, and

n = is the number of years.

Therefore, the total amount that would be saved up after 37 years =

FV = \frac{3,990.59(1+0.071)^{37} - 1}{0.071}

= (3,990.59 * 11.6535)/0.071

= $654,990.31.

By spending $32,523 annually from an account earning 7.1% compound interest rate for 30 years, the present value of the total amount needed by RuthAnn today that will be sufficient for her retirement spending can be estimated using the present value of an annuity formula.

PV = \frac{A(1 - (1+r)^{-n}}{r}

= PV = \frac{32,523(1 - (1.071)^{-30}}{0.071}

= (32523 * 0.8723)/0.071

= $399,574.83.

Since the amount saved up ($654,990.31) is more than the total amount required for RuthAnn's retirement ($399,574.83), RuthAnn has more than sufficient to meet her Retirement goal.

Specifically, the amount she has saved up can support a maximum annual spending which can be estimated from the present value of an annuity formula.

PV = \frac{A(1 - (1+r)^{-n}}{r}

where PV = the amount saved up, $654,990.31,

A = the annual spending which we are estimating,

r = the 7.1% compound interest rate,

n = the number of years to retirement.

654,990.31 = \frac{A(1 - (1.071)^{-30}}{0.071}

= 654,990.31 = (A * 0.8723)/0.071

= A = 654,990.31/0.8723 * 0.071

= A = 53,312.29

Thus, the amount saved up can support a maximum retirement spending of $53,312.29, which is higher than the $32,523 annual income needed by RuthAnn for her retirement.

6 0
3 years ago
North Around, Inc. stock is expected to return 22 percent in a boom, 13 percent in a normal economy, and −15 percent in a recess
almond37 [142]

Answer:

4.53%

Explanation:

Data provided in the question:

Expected return = ∑ (Return × probability)

Thus,

Expected return = (0.06 × 22) + (0.92 × 13) + (0.02 × (-15))

= 12.98%

Now,

Probability       Return        Probability × (Return-Expected Return)²

0.06                  22                   0.06 × (22% - 12.98%)² = 4.8816

0.92                  13                    0.92 × (13% - 12.98%)² = 0.000368

0.02                  -15                   0.02 × (-15% - 12.98%)² = 5.657608

========================================================

                                                                            Total = 20.5396%

Standard deviation = \sqrt{\frac{\text{Total probability}\times(\text{Return-Expected Return})^2}{\text{Total probability}}

= √(20.5396)

= 4.53%

6 0
3 years ago
You can receive 400,000 five years from today or 1,000,000 thirty years from today. what interest rate makes them equivalent?
deff fn [24]

Answer:

3.73%

Explanation:

The computation of the rate of interest that makes the equivalent is shown below:

As we know that

Present value=Cash flow × Present value discounting factor ( interest rate% , time period)

Let us assume the interest rate be x

where,

Present value of $400,000 is

= $400,000 ÷ 1.0x ^5

And,

Present value of $1,000,000 be

= $1,000,000 ÷ 1.0x^30

Now eqaute these two equations

$400,000 ÷ 1.0x^5 = $1,000,000 ÷ 1.0x^30

(1.0x^30) ÷ (1.0x^5) = $1,000,000 ÷ $400,000

1.0x^(30 - 5)=2.5

1.0x^25=2.5

1.0x = (2.5)^(1 ÷ 25)

x =1.03733158 - 1

= 3.73%

3 0
3 years ago
During the current year, Eleanor earns $120,000 in wages as an employee of an accounting firm. She also earns $13,000 in gross i
larisa86 [58]

Answer:

$10,000

Explanation:

Eleanor's self-employment tax will require an understanding of a few points.

1. Eleanor earns $120,000 as wages working for an accounting firm therefore, this wages do not qualify for self-employment tax

2. Eleanor earns $13,000 as gross income for her own  consulting service and this is self-employment income. However, $3,000 qualify as deductible expenses from the gross income. Taxable self-employment income= $13,000-$3,000= $10,000

3. Long term capital gain tax incurred = $1,000. Ordinarily the capital gain tax should increase the tax.  However, its inclusion will be based on the federal government's table for calculating payment of long-term capital gain tax for 2019 based on income for the year.

Looking at the table, income from $0 Up to $39,375 will attract 0% payment of long-term capital gain tax. Since, the self-employment income of Eleanor is $10,000, no long-term capital gain tax will be incurred.

It means only the 13,000-3,000= $10,000 will be tax for self employment

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Cozy Country Market entered the candle business with a unique product: a line of candles made from soy that produce less smoke a
    6·1 answer
  • A business professor is examining the relationship between age and ethical business behavior. The research is not being conducte
    12·2 answers
  • The term ________ refers to a practice whereby a salesperson initially accepts a customer's offer, but then claims an error and
    12·1 answer
  • If an expansionary policy pushes output beyond the full employment level of gdp:
    5·1 answer
  • What is likely to be an individual’s single biggest asset?
    15·1 answer
  • Assume that a risky security pays an average cash flow of $100 in one year. The risk-free rate is 5%, and the expected return on
    14·1 answer
  • Toys Unlimited has the following cost data available. Direct Materials are $99 per unit. Direct Labor is $55 per unit. Variable
    15·1 answer
  • Stephanie is nervous about giving a presentation at the marketing firm or she works. One of her male coworkers told her don't be
    13·1 answer
  • Stacey was invited to become a member of the class project team because the other members knew she had a high GPA and worked har
    6·1 answer
  • What is an advantage of taking out a long-term loan instead of a short-term
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!