Answer:
c)The proof writer mentally assumed the conclusion. He wrote "suppose n is an arbitrary integer", but was really thinking "suppose n is an arbitrary integer, and suppose that for this n, there exists an integer k that satisfies n < k < n+2." Under those assumptions, it follows indeed that k must be n + 1, which justifies the word "therefore": but of course assuming the conclusion destroyed the validity of the proof.
Step-by-step explanation:
when we claim something as a hypothesis we can only conclude with therefore at the end of the proof. so assuming the conclusion nulify the proof from the beginning
Quadrant 4 is the correct answer, and it's the only
2000
4000
6000
8000
2460
2440
2420
4280
4260
4220
6666
Step-by-step explanation:
2000
2420
2440
2460
4000
4220
4260
4280
6000
6666
8000
Answer:
value is -3n 1 =2 OK please follow me and thanks
Shirts and pants are both $2 each.
Using the elimination method, we can solve this system of equations. You must find a common multiple of both equation for either x or y. I chose to multiply equation 2 by (-2) so that the x would be eliminated, allowing us to solve for y.
Work: