Answer:
But when the 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868, it officially repealed the three-fifths compromise. Section 2 of the amendment states that seats in the House of Representatives were to be determined based on “the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed."
Explanation:
Massachusetts Anti-Federalists Oppose the Three-Fifths Compromise. The ratification of the United States Constitution was the subject of intense debate between 1787 and 1789.
Answer:
e)
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the objection he is most likely to raise would be pleading the fifth. The Fifth amendment states that in a criminal trial you have the right to refuse to answer a question on the grounds that you might incriminate yourself. Therefore he has a fifth amendment right against self-incrimination and can refuse to respond to the questions that are being made to him.
The rule of law is "The authority and influence of law in society, especially when viewed as a constraint on individual and institutional behavior; (hence) the principle whereby all members of a society (including those in government) are considered equally subject to publicly disclosed legal codes and processes".[2] The phrase "the rule of law" refers to a political situation, not to any specific legal rule. So under the rule of law nobody is above the law and even the president or the richest American citizen must abide the law.
