answer
They both joined with the colonizing country and created a huge empires
<span>Martinson and colleagues research that was concluded with nothing works is most closely linked to the idea of rehabilitation. He felt that those who were low risk criminals had a better shot at rehabilitation than high risk criminals.</span>
There are good arguments on both sides as to when and how fast to reopen the economy. In my view, the answer will vary state by state and industry by industry. There’s also an enormous amount of uncertainty as to exactly how to determine the optimal policy. In that environment, there’s a great advantage to having these decisions be made at as local a level as possible. Thus, while I suspect that Sweden’s current policy is not optimal, that Nordic country is doing a great service to Europe by providing evidence on the consequences of an alternative policy path.
Giving too much power to any one person is dangerous, especially when that person might be influenced by political considerations that go beyond the best interest of the country as a whole:
That’s not to say Trump’s views are necessary wrong; rather that the procedure he uses to reach decisions is not reliable. Thus I’d still favor local control even if in one particular case you could convince me that the views of the person who happened to be president at the time were superior to the views of the average mayor or governor. In the long run, competition between states will produce better governance than central planning.
Answer:
A fixed bail schedule.
Explanation:
Bail in the United States refers to the practice of releasing suspects from custody before their hearing, through payment of bail which is referred to as money or pledge of property to the court which may be refunded if suspects return to court for their trial. Bail practices in the United States vary from state to state. Fixed bail schedule is a form of schedule by which the Judge gives the defendant a bail bond to meet up with. A bail bond is an agreement by a criminal defendant to appear for trial or pay a sum of money set by the court. The bail bond is cosigned by a bail bondsman, who charges the defendant a fee in return for guaranteeing the payment.
The bail bond is a type of surety bond.
Bail reforms was enacted by a nearly unanimous Congress,40 the Bail Reform Act of 1966became effective on September 20, 1966. It signified the first major over-became effective on September 20, 1966. It signified the first major overhaul of federal bail law since 1789 when, by passage of the Judiciary Act, 41 the first Congress made bail a matter of right in non-capital cases.
By its terms, the Bail Reform Act fosters release of defendants, both be-ore trial and pending appeal, on terms except from financial bond. It does not totally erase a judge's right to require a money bond. 42 Under trial and pending appeal, on terms except from financial bond. It does not totally erase a judge's right to require a money bond. 42 Under Section 3146, by authority the judicial officer can impose whatever "conditions of release" he deems fit to insure the accused's appearance at trial. The factors that are considered when conditions of release are set comprises of community and family ties, employment, time period of residence in the community, previous convictions, financial capability the nature and circumstances of the offense charged, the weight of the evidence against the accused, and the defendant's record of appearance at previous court proceedings, including any prior flight risk flouted.
The clear reason of the Bail Reform Act is to make release without posting money bond the norm, not the exception.
