Answer:
Disgusted.
Explanation:
After being restricted for so long on the things they can own or do, it must have been hurtful and sad to see that nobody on the outside understands the situation they are actually in. It must make them feel hopeless, and in disgust as their situation can seem so bright to people who aren't there.
Answer:
Explanation:
Open-source innovation has not revolutionized and software and biotech industries. It completely changes the way that we think about creativity. To do something new we don't have to do something new we an existing or emerging form, made available through access and do something new with them. This promotes democracy in the innovation game, with open source services against persons or groups or against field or endeavors. The new open-source landscape is a vastly fertile one, with countless possibilities for growth, but its vastness and freedom can also overwhelming.
<u>Here are three key shifts:
</u>
- Passive recipients to active co-creator
- Our culture and our system for customers and emerging opportunities
- Own and protect to share and expand
<u>Answer:
</u>
The distributive process by which the burdens and rewards that society has to offer are shared varies from society to society is a TRUE statement.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- Factors like the geography of a region and the tendency of the people formed based on it have to play an important role in how the people in any given region share burdens and rewards amongst themselves.
- Moreover, the varied the demographics of the given region, varied are the patterns of the distribution of burdens and rewards.
I don't know who De Vaca is but by context clues I would infer that he realized that Native Americans where not the savages they where thought to be.
