Answer:
Different countries have different advertising/promotional laws. Plus you have no target market if you're creating a promotional message to use for all countries. Also, assuming if your promotional message inspired, say a person in Africa, a person in Russia, a person in China, and a person in Japan bought a product from your promotion, you would have to ship to all of those countries with extreme shipping rates.
Answer:
B. Commercial impracticability
Explanation:
Commercial impracticabilty occurs when the actions under a contract is impractical and cannot be accomplished or achieved. It is triggered when actions or performance of a contract by a party has become impracticable and hence unfeasible or maybe just too difficult or costly to accomplish. The best defense for the florist in this case is commercial impracticabilty as the disease sweeping through the type of rose Belinda ordered has made it difficult and costly to accomplish or achieve.
Answer:
Debit Petty Cash $250; credit Cash $250
Explanation:
Based on the information given we were told that the Company establishes the amount of $250 as a petty cash fund on September 1 which means that The journal entry to record the establishment of the fund on September 1 is:
Debit Petty Cash $250
Credit Cash $250
Answer:
The very earliest that a pregnancy can be confirmed with an ultrasound in a horse is approximately after two weeks after the breeding took place.
Explanation:
Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
