A consequentialist approach to ethics is an approach that claims that the morality of an action depends on its outcome. This means that an action is "good" is the consequence it brings is good as well. An example of such a theory is Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism states that an action is morally good if it leads to the most happiness for greatest number of people. However, an objection that can be made to this theory is that utility and happiness are subjective, as well as difficult to measure.
On the other hand, non-consequentialist ethics state that the morality of an action is based on the rightness and wrongness of the actions themselves and not the consequences of those actions. An example of this is the Natural Rights Theory, which states that humans have an inherent right to certain rights, regardless of human behaviour. However, it is unclear who has the right to state what these rights are, which has led to criticism of the theory.
The answer would be near California and Nevada
They felt that it gave the federal government 2 much power.
The answer to this question is <span>draw the line as to what exactly was too strong of a shock.
After a certain amount of shock of delivered, the learners plea to stop the experiment increased according to the level of the voltage.
When the learners are encouraged that they could take more, they felt some mental reassurance that they could take more because they do not understand the thresold of other learners can do.</span>
<span>
D.
most Greeks left Greece because of extreme poverty
brainliest me in week if none else answers remember
</span>
