<span>
Let's analyze Hannah's work, step-by-step, to see if she made any mistakes. </span>In Step 1, Hannah wrote

<span> as the sum of two separate derivatives </span>

<span>using the </span><span>sum rule.
</span>
This step is perfectly fine. In Step 2,

was kept as it is, and

was rewritten as

using the constant rule.Indeed, according to the constant rule, the derivative of a constant number is equal to zero.
This step is perfectly fine. In Step 3,

was rewritten as

supposedly using the constant multiple rule.
The problem is that according to the constant multiple rule,

should be rewritten as

and not as

.
<span>
Therefore, Hannah made a mistake in this step.</span>
Step-by-step explanation:
eue7e7euydhdhrydyydhdhdhdhhr
Answer:
16.777% (7 repeating)
Step-by-step explanation:
well 1/2 is 50% and 1/3 is 33.333% so i think its about 16.777%
Answer:
4(x+1)/(4x+5)
4(x+1)/(5-4x)
4(x-(-1))/(4x+5)
Step-by-step explanation:
The numerators in the fractions must equal to 0, or else the expressions won’t have the result of 0.
4(x+1)
4(-1+1)
4(0)
= 0
4(x-(-1))
4(-1-(-1))
4(-1+1)
4(0)
= 0
The expressions with the numerator as 0 have the result of 0.
Andrew has 10 pens bc it's half of twenty