The answer is 20%, 40 is 1/5 of 200, therefore it is 20%
Answer:
Americans piled into the metal as protection from the collapsing value of the dollar. But since the 1970s, the government has enacted a series of laws that have made owning gold more difficult, more costly, and less private.
Explanation:
:D
Answer:
The correct answer is d) neither the long-run Phillips curve nor the Classical dichotomy.
Explanation:
The answer that best suits the situation described is the Phillips curve in the short term but not in the long term.
The Phillips curve starts from the principle that the amount of money circulating (commonly called "money supply") has real effects on the economy in the short term. In this way, an increase in the money supply would have a beneficial effect on aggregate demand, as citizens will spend more when their nominal wages are increased (known as “monetary illusion”) and a more favorable framework for investment and investment will be created. that the prospects of rising prices will improve the expectations of corporate profits. The improvement in aggregate demand would result in greater economic growth, and this in turn in the creation of new jobs. This is how an inverse relationship between inflation and unemployment is established, expressed graphically by a downward curve.
Answer:
$69.47
Explanation:
D1 = ($1.45*1.20) = $1.7
D2 = ($1.7*1.20) = $2.04
D3 = ($2.04*1.20) = $2.45
Value after year 3 = (D3*Growth Rate) / (Required rate-Growth Rate)
Value after year 3 = ($2.45*1.08) / 0.11-0.08
Value after year 3 = $2.646 / 0.03
Value after year 3 = $88.20
Current share price = Future dividend and value*Present value of discounting factor(rate%,time)
Current share price = $1.7/1.11 + $2.04/(1.11)^2 + $2.45/(1.11)^3 + $88.20/(1.11)^3
Current share price = $1.5315315 + $1.65571 + $1.7914189 + $64.49107
Current share price = $69.4697304
Current share price = $69.47
Answer:
Devil’s advocacy
Explanation:
Devil’s advocacy is a thorough analysis of a preferred alternative to check and test its strengths and weaknesses before being implemented with the purpose of identifying all the faults that might make the preferred alternative unacceptable.
This method helps in determining the dangers of any action taken by an individual or group of persons.
