There are three outcomes of 4 out of eighteen outcomes, so the fraction of angle of spinner numbered 4 is
Answer:
150
Step-by-step explanation:
15*10
Lets get rid of the 0 for now
15*1
That is 15 added to itself 0 times so it is 15
Now lets put the 0 back
and we will get
150
From the steps shown in the table given, we can conclude that: D. in solving the equation, the subtraction property of equality was not applied.
<h3>What is the Subtraction Property of Equality?</h3>
If a + b = c, to apply the subtraction property of equality so that b is moved to the other side of the equation, we would have:
a + b - b = c - b
a = c - b
Thus, from the table given, the none of the steps showed that the subtraction property of equality was applied in solving the equation, so, the answer is: D.
Learn more about the subtraction property of equality on:
brainly.com/question/1601404
#SPJ1
Answer: I’m not really sure what the correct answer is if you could help that would be great so let me know
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
In the model
Log (salary) = B0 + B1LSAT +B2GPA +B3log(libvol) +B4log(cost)+B5 rank+u
The hypothesis that rank has no effect on log (salary) is H0:B5 = 0. The estimated equation (now with standard errors) is
Log (salary) = 8.34 + .0047 LSAT + .248 GPA + .095 log(libvol)
(0.53) (.0040) (.090) (.033)
+ .038 log(cost) – .0033 rank
(.032) (.0003)
n = 136, R2 = .842.
The t statistic on rank is –11(i.e. 0.0033/0.0003), which is very significant. If rank decreases by 10 (which is a move up for a law school), median starting salary is predicted to increase by about 3.3%.
(ii) LSAT is not statistically significant (t statistic ≈1.18) but GPA is very significance (t statistic ≈2.76). The test for joint significance is moot given that GPA is so significant, but for completeness the F statistic is about 9.95 (with 2 and 130 df) and p-value ≈.0001.