Answer:
a. natural law for Josh, and legal positivism for Colin.
Explanation:
Natural law is a concept that seeks to ground law in common sense, rationality, equity and pragmatism. It does not propose a description of human affairs through a formalized theory or law; Nor does it seek to reach the level of descriptive social science. Natural law has, as its project, to evaluate human options in order to act reasonably and well in the conception of the individual. Josh is using the concept of natural law when he believes, based on his own common sense conceptions, that it is correct for him to decide how fast he will have to ride his own car.
On the other hand, legal positivism refers to a set of norms formulated and enforced by human beings. These norms represent an order that must be followed even if it seems unfair and incorrect. This can be seen in Colin's argument that Josh must slow down the car because it is exceeding the speed allowed by law.
Answer:
Suppose a bill is passed to make minimum hourly wage as $7.50, the implications would be that:
-If the minimum wage is set at $10.50, the market will not reach equilibrium.
-In the absence of price controls, a shortage puts upward pressure on wages until they rise to the equilibrium.
Therefore only the two above listed statements would be TRUE.
South Asia<span> and </span>Central Asia<span>.</span>
Answer:<span>a permanent committee to write laws</span>
The marginal benefir on the second boat will definitely increase.
The marginal benefit will tend to rise until it hit a certain amount where any addition to the same product will just seem abundant.
The point where the marginal benefit started to fall almost never exist on the secon purchase.
