Although humans made stone tools for 200,000 years the most sophisticated form and last complete stone tool kit is the <u>crude stone tools </u>represented by: the awl, atlatl and bow & arrow.
<h3 /><h3>What were crude stone tool?</h3>
Any tool that is partially or totally fashioned out of stone is considered a stone tool in the broadest definition. Even if there are still societies and cultures that rely on stone tools, most of them are related to extinct prehistoric (especially Stone Age) cultures.
Archaeologists frequently research these prehistoric societies, and the examination of stone tools is known as lithic analysis. To deepen our understanding of the cultural ramifications of stone tool use and production, ethnoarchaeology has been a useful research field.
Arrowheads, spearheads, hand axes, and querns are just a few examples of the numerous tools made from stone throughout history. Stone can be ground into tools or it can be shaped by a flintknapper into knapped implements.
Learn more about stone tool
brainly.com/question/1446731
#SPJ4
Answer:
In summary, types of business entity should be differentiated in Ownership; ... Credit transactions: the buyer does not have to pay for the item on receipt, but is allowed ... Dr.Cash 600 Cr.Irrecoverable debt expense 600 8.2 An allowance for ... the day is as follows: Assets Capital + Liabilities （Inventory $50）
Explanation:
Answer:
start at the top of the command structure
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described it can be said that the best solution to this would most likely be to start at the top of the command structure. This would allow you to go down the chain of command in order to find and stop the communication problem at the source. Which in doing so you will fix the problem completely, since the rest of the employees will begin to receive the correct information regarding the products.
Answer: <em><u>16.5% is the average tax rate that will result in a 10 percent increase in tax revenues.</u></em>
Explanation:
This is an example of static forecasting since no time parameter is involved.
Now,
Let initial revenue be "R" ,
"n" be no. of taxpayer
∴ R= 65000×0.15×n
R +0.1R= 65000×rate×n
Using the above two equation, we'll get ;
<u><em>r = 16.5%</em></u>
Answer:
If we made the assumption that both countries had a per capita of $15,000 in 1960, country A, which entered an era of political stability, and applied liberal reforms, growing at a rate of 5%, would double its GDP per capita by 1975, reaching a GDP per capita of $31,183.92.
On the contrary, country B, which continued to grow by 1% per year, would only double its GDP per capita by 2030, reaching a figure of $30,101.45.
Therefore, it would take 55 years more for country B to double its per capita GDP level compared to country A.
