It will be 4.06, 4.3, 4.306 and 4.36
Step-by-step explanation:
Since the ratio of monthly income to savings of the family is 7:2, we assume that the income be 7t and savings be 2t
Now, we are given that the savings is =Rs 500
So, According to our assumption, 2t=500
⇒t=250
Hence, the income of the family is =7×250=Rs 1750
And the expenditure is =Income−Savings
=Rs 1750−Rs 500
=Rs 1250
H>12 and w>12 however p≤60
p=2(h+w) but give what we have above for h and w
p>48 so p must satisfy the solution set:
48<p≤60 and since p=2(h+w)
48<2(h+w)≤60
24<h+w≤30
So there are infinitely many solutions if h and w are not restricted to integer values...
(h,w) vary from (12,18) to (18,12) Note that neither endpoints exist, 12 because it is explicitly excluded and 18 because that would make the other dimension 12 which is excluded...
Now if you are just talking integer values, there are only:
(13,17),(14,16),(15,15),(16,14),(17,13)
I think that the answer is A. If you look, 60 students is half of 120 students so 50% of them have a cell phone plan with company x. 36 students is a third of 120 students. Since they want to know about how many people have a cell phone plan with company y out of 380 students, you do 380 divided by 3.333333333333 you get 114.
Answer:
![-\frac{3}{8} , -\frac{3}{16} , \frac{7}{4}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=-%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7B8%7D%20%2C%20-%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7B16%7D%20%2C%20%5Cfrac%7B7%7D%7B4%7D)
Step-by-step explanation:
When looking at fractions, a larger denominator means that the numerator is divided by a larger amount, making it smaller. 7/4 is positive, so we already know it goes last. -3/16 has a larger denominator than -3/8, but in this case,
because -3/16 is closer to zero. This means that in order, these fractions would be -3/8, -3/16, 7/4. Hope this was helpful.