Answer:
The following statement does not reflect a likely response to the conflict between Jo’s attitude and her behavior - <em>"It's wrong to break even minor laws, but I'll probably keep speeding anyway."</em>
Explanation:
<u>The conflict between Jo’s attitude and her behavior</u> regarding breaking speed limits <u>would lead to cognitive dissonance and thus a need to justify her behavior.</u>
All three remaining statements would help her to reduce cognitive dissonance by finding explanation to her behavior, <u>while the given statement does not correspond to her belief that she is a law-abiding citizen.</u> Being law-abiding means taking the laws and their violation seriously. That is why individuals who sometimes violate laws feel bad about it and seek to justify what they do.
<span>An attitude has 3 major components
The 3 major components of attitudes are:
- Cognitive component (which derives from someone's personal belief)
- Emotional/affective component (Which derives from someone's feelings)
- Behavioral component (Which derives from someone's daily habit)</span>
Self-Efficacy Theory <span>refers to people's confidence that they can perform a behavior to produce a desired outcome in a particular situation.</span>
Answer:
data are mixed, with some studies showing a benefit from the interruption but with many studies showing no effect
Explanation:
This indicates that individuals' brain operate on different ways. Some people need a pre-stimulation before their brain able to focus and operate on higher scale.
So when these type of people are interrupted in the middle of the task, it is really hard for them to get back to the 'zone' and have to repeat the whole process from the beginning.Some individuals on the other hand, can use their brain to high capacity without any pre-stimulation.
