Answer:
clear informational influence
Explanation:
Stanley Milgram was a famous social psychologist who has researched the "effect of authority" on obedience. Thus, he concluded that individuals obey the authority figures for either of the two reasons including "out of fear" or "out of an aspiration to look cooperative".
Informational influence: The term "informational influence" is described as an individual's conformity under the affirmation of evidence associated with the reality that has been provided by some other individuals.
In the question above, the given statement signifies that "clear informational influence" plays an important role in influencing behavior.
Answer:
Mitigation
Explanation:
In the process of <u>Mitigation</u> we make plans an take actions to eliminate or reduce the threat of future death and destruction when natural hazards suddenly become great threats.
Believing that others are right is
to private acceptance and as conforming without believing is to public
compliance. Public compliance involves a change in behavior including the
public expression of opinions that is not accompanied by an actual change in
one’s private opinion. Thus, compliance represents what people do or say in
public, even though they believe something different in private. A driver might
follow the speed limit or wear a tie which is a behavior to conform to social
norms even though we may not necessarily believe that it is appropriate to do
so which is opinion. However, behaviors that are formerly executed out of a
desire to be accepted which is normative conformity may frequently produce
changes in beliefs to match them and the result becomes private acceptance
which is for instance a child who begins smoking to please his friends but soon
convinces himself that it is the right thing to do or a prisoner of war who
eventually accepts the political beliefs of his captor.
Answer:
It will be admissible as the testimony will be used to impeach the witness for being biased against the restaurant.
Explanation:
The US legal system allows for witness impeachment where bias can be the cause for concern. As this cross examination of the waiter by the defense laid the foundation to accuse him of bias, the court would allow this new testimony as evidence of bias.
