Answer:
a random & coincidental occurrence
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario Oleg's predictive accuracy can be attributed as being a random & coincidental occurrence. This is mainly due to the fact that making this prediction correctly 7 times in a row has extremely low odds of happening and those odds keep getting worse the more times he tosses the coin.
Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC and Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo
The given statement is false.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Objections raised by the customer side are generally based on the price of the product, old-fashioned brush-offs, competitor products or product fits. It is customary to object the products in the market by the buyers.
Objections may be classified into four types namely,
- Price of the product
- Relationship/Trust
- Quality of service
- Customary stall
From the statement given in the question we can interpret that the customer has lost the trust on the after sales services of the copier. Therefore, we can conclude that the statement is an example of objection due to quality of service.
Another word would be arms
