1) 201.6 ounces. (16 ounces in 1 lb)
2) 3090 grams (1000g in 1 kg)
3)8820 in (36in in 1 yd)
PLEASE GIVE BRAINLIEST
Answer:
c or d
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Null hypothesis is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
Alternative hypothesis is U1 - U2 > 0
Step-by-step explanation:
The question involves a comparison of the two types of training given to the salespeople. The requirement is to set up the hypothesis that type A training leads to higher mean weakly sales compared to type B training.
Let U1 = mean sales by type A trainees
Let U2 = mean sales by type B trainees
Therefore, the null hypothesis (H0) is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
This implies that type A training does not result in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
The alternative hypothesis (H1) is: U1 - U2 > 0
This implies that type A training indeed results in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
Ok, so after you do -8a+5a, you also have to do 6 -35, getting the equation
-29-3a