1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
I am Lyosha [343]
3 years ago
12

A company reported net income of $6 million. During the year the average number of common shares outstanding was 3 million. The

price of a share of common stock at the end of the year was $5. There were 400,000 shares of preferred stock outstanding on average and no dividends were declared and the preferred stock is noncumulative. The EPS is approximately: a.$0.40. b.$1.76. c.$1.86. d.$2.00. The Price/Earnings ratio is approximately: a.2.00. b,2.50. c,2.84. d.12.50. Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E): The price to earnings ratio (P/E) is used a relative valuation or multiple for shares of stock. The multiple is based on earnings per share (EPS). So, if a company has a PE ratio of 2, it means the share price is trading at 2 times earnings. If the PE ratio is 20, it means the share price is trading at 20 times earnings. Since earnings are earnings, the PE ratio acts like a price tag. Some companies have a higher share price for the same level of earnings. Why
Business
1 answer:
malfutka [58]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The EPS is approximately:

it can be any of them:

  • if preferred dividends = $4,800,000, then EPS = $0.40 (option A)
  • if preferred dividends = $720,000, then EPS = $1.76 (option B)
  • if preferred dividends = $0, then EPS = $2 (option D)

EPS = (net income - preferred dividends) / outstanding shares = ($6,000,000 - preferred dividends) / 3,000,000 shares

The Price/Earnings ratio is approximately:

  • if EPS = $0.40, then PE ratio = 12.5 (option D)
  • if EPS = $1.76, then PE ratio = 2.84 (option C)
  • if EPS = $2, then PE ratio = 2.5 (option B)

Price/earnings (PE) ratio = share price / EPS = $5 / EPS

EPS cannot be $1.80, since PE ratio = 2.78 and that is not an option.

Some companies have a higher share price for the same level of earnings. Why?

Some stocks like Amazon have a very low EPS, form any years its EPS was very low bu its stock price kept rising. The stock price is based mostly on potential future earnings, not current earnings. A company that is being liquidated might have a high EPS, but a very low stock price since it will stop operating soon.  

You might be interested in
Which of the following best describes the relationship between diminishing marginal returns and marginal cost?a. If marginal ret
Ivanshal [37]

Answer: option(a) is correct.

Explanation:

Diminishing marginal returns also known as diminishing returns. It states that the additional input or factor of production that is used for the production of certain products and services, results in smaller increase in output. The output increases but at an decreasing rate. This is due to the efficiency or productivity of the additional factor of production. This will results in higher marginal cost because of the lower productivity from the additional input. So, marginal cost must be increasing.

4 0
3 years ago
Mike and Tom debone chicken breasts for Ted's Chicken Co. Mike is new and can only debone 30 chicken breasts per hour, while Tom
vodka [1.7K]

Answer:

Their average hourly productivity as a team for chicken breasts will be

45.

Explanation:

Here, it is given that Mike and Tom debone chicken breasts for Ted' chicken company.

Mike debones 30 chicken breasts,

Meanwhile Tom is having his own experience in this work and knows how to calculate the hourly work

So, Tom allows Mike to debone only 60 chicken breasts per hour.

Now its mentioned that both Tom and Mike had worked 40hrs per week.

So, their average hourly productivity as a team will be:

                 frac\ {{30} +{60}} {2}

                    ⇒ 45

So, their average hourly productivity as a team for chicken breasts will be 45.

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following are reasons why managers often struggle to work closely together to create customer value? a. Managers fo
nydimaria [60]

Answer:

The correct answer is the option F: a, b and c only.

Explanation:

To begin with, in most of the cases where a company receives commodities from other business and also gives finished products to other companies normally tend to focus more in his own stock price just like the other members of the supply chain do. In addition to that, these types of companies also focuses in the short run and in the day to day business due to the fact that do not encourage the fact of creating an alliance with the other members of the chain. And finally, all those factors take part of a whole that also includes the fact of not having time to learn how to implement collavorative business models to improve the perfomance of the business at the long run due to the fact that the managers are to busy working in the day to day operations and focuses on the short run and their own stock prices and not on working with the other managers' companies of the supply chain to establish an alliance that will help all of the members to improve everyone's performance and product.

7 0
3 years ago
The most efficient way to overcome the principal-agent problem in a firm is to:
icang [17]
<span>Provide stock option to the agent This issue emerges when a person known as the agent consents to work for another which is the principal for some financial gains . Such arrangements may cause tremendous expenses for the agent in themanner prompting the issues of good risk and irreconcilable circumstance. Inferable from the expenses brought about, the agent may start to seek after his own particular plan and disregard the best rule and practice that will benefit the principal's work</span>
4 0
4 years ago
A common solution to the free-rider problem is Choose one or more: A. for government to provide the good and then pay for its pr
seraphim [82]

Answer:

A. for government to provide the good and then pay for its production through taxation.

Explanation:

Free Riding is an economic problem implying usage of 'non excludable' good, by people not contributing to pay for it.

Example : Roads, Bridges etc.

One most suitable solution to free rider problem is : Providing it through government and treating all prospective beneficiaries as unified consumers set , dividing the entire total cost equally between all of them - through mechanism of taxation

5 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following demonstrates the law of demand? a. After Jon got a raise at work, he bought more pretzels at $1.50 per pr
    6·1 answer
  • Use of the gdp deflator allows economists to estimate the real rate of growth of the economy.
    11·2 answers
  • Runner's warehouse purchased digital watches for $92.99. its markup rate is 25% based on the selling price. what is the selling
    15·1 answer
  • The monetary transmission mechanism works through the effects of changes in the money supply on:
    5·1 answer
  • What does free contract mean?
    5·1 answer
  • Which example best demonstrates the capabilities of e-mail?
    15·2 answers
  • Intellectual ___________ is intangible creative work that is embodied in physical form and includes copyrights, trademarks, and
    11·1 answer
  • Bay City Company’s fixed budget performance report for July follows. The $367,000 budgeted total expenses include $280,000 varia
    9·1 answer
  • On December 1, Spencer Department Store borrowed $19,250 from First Bank and Trust. Spencer signed a 90-day note with a face amo
    14·1 answer
  • a stock is expected to pay the dividend of $1 per share in two months and in five months. the stock price is $50, and the risk-f
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!