Answer:
Cash shorting = 36,010 - 36,006 = $4
DR Cash $36,006
Cash Short and Over $ 4
CR Sales $36,010
There is a shortage of cash as the sales figure is more than the cash amount. The Cash Short and Over account will therefore be debited to reflect this expense.
Answer:
Explanation:
Net Income = 20m
Sales = 100m
Debt-equity ration = 40%
Asset turnover = 0.60
A)
Profit Margin = Net Income / Sales = $20 million / $100 million = 20%
Equity Multiplier = 1 + Debt-Equity Ratio = 1 + 0.40 = 1.40
Return on Equity = Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * Equity Multiplier = 20% * 0.60 * 1.40 = 16.80%
B)
Debt-equity ratio = 60%
Equity Multiplier = 1 + Debt-Equity Ratio = 1 + 0.60 = 1.60
Return on Equity = Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * Equity Multiplier = 20% * 0.60 * 1.60 = 19.20%
As calculations provide, if debt-equity ratio increases to 60%, Return on equity will increase by 2.40% (19.20% - 16.80%)
Answer:
$9,097
Explanation:
Net cash flow from operating activities = + $47,042
Net cash flow from investing activities = - $21,831
Net cash flow from financing activities = - $28,397
Net cash flows for the period = - $3,186
Beginning cash account balance = $12,283
Net cash flows for the period = - $3,186
Ending cash balance = $9,097
Answer:
The price of a Dinner= $6.22
Explanation:
<em>Mark-up is the proportion of the product cost which is expected to be made as profit. In other words, it is profit expressed as a percentage of product cost.</em>
To account for the spoilage rate of 10%, $3.50 unit cost would be consider as 90% of the cost. Thus, 100% of the cost would be given as follows:
Dinner cost = 100/(100-10)× 3.50= 3.89
The price of a Dinner = product cost + 60% of product cost
The price of a Dinner = 3.89 + 60%*3.89= $6.22
The price of a Dinner= $6.22
Answer:
Multinational enterprises (MNEs)
Relationship Change as the MNE moves from Globalization 2.0 to Globalization 3.0 operations:
This move means that Indian and Chinese companies would be competing with my local small firm. The MNE may be looking for cheaper prices for my company's products and services, which the Indian and Chinese companies would more efficiently supply it. My firm may be on the precipice of liquidating if this MNE is our major customer. My firm must move fast to become more competitive by differentiating our products and services with better quality and perhaps reduced production costs, to enable it compete more favorably with the Indian and Chinese competitors. Otherwise, we may regard the relationship as nearing its end and prepare for other opportunities with other companies.
Explanation:
Globalization reduces national boundaries by integrating national economies into a globalized economy, thus enabling companies to compete globally for financial resources, goods, and services. When Globalization 1.0 happened, countries were globalized and the world became a global village. When Globalization 2.0 from which the G7 profited largely, companies were globalized. With the current Globalization 3.0, individuals are being globalized, and the highest beneficiaries are Indian and Chinese nationals who appear better prepared to take on the world, garner most of the important resources to themselves, and call the shots from the boardrooms. An example is Microsoft's current CEO, Satya Nadella, who is an Indian-American.
