Hi there!

You would have to simplify the terms inside [ ] this thing, then multiply.

So let's simplify them first.

4 - (3c - 1)
use distributive property.....
4 - 3c + 1
-3c + 5

6 - (3c - 1)
use distributive property again...
6 - 3c + 1
-3c + 7

so now, multiply (-3c + 5)(-3c + 7).
(-3c + 5)(-3c + 7)
9c² - 21c - 15c + 35
9c² - 36c + 35

So your final answer is...
9c² - 36c + 35

Hope this helped! :)

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

PLEASE NEEED HEELPP

krok68 [10]

There are many systems of equation that will satisfy the requirement for Part A.
an example is y≤(1/4)x-3 and y≥(-1/2)x-6
y≥(-1/2)x-6 goes through the point (0,-6) and (-2, -5), the shaded area is above the line. all the points fall in the shaded area, but
y≤(1/4)x-3 goes through the points (0,-3) and (4,-2), the shaded area is below the line, only A and E are in the shaded area.
only A and E satisfy both inequality, in the overlapping shaded area.

Part B. to verify, put the coordinates of A (-3,-4) and E(5,-4) in both inequalities to see if they will make the inequalities true.
for y≤(1/4)x-3: -4≤(1/4)(-3)-3
-4≤-3&3/4 This is valid.
For y≥(-1/2)x-6: -4≥(-1/2)(-3)-6
-4≥-4&1/3 this is valid as well. So Yes, A satisfies both inequalities.
Do the same for point E (5,-4)

Part C: the line y<-2x+4 is a dotted line going through (0,4) and (-2,0)
the shaded area is below the line
farms A, B, and D are in this shaded area.

8 0

3 years ago