Answer:
1.) 6
2.) -1
3.) 36
4.) 1/3
5.) 90
Step-by-step explanation:
1.) -12/a
-12/a -> -12/2
=6
2.) a+ (-b)
a+(-b) -> 2+(-3)
=-1
3.) 3a (12-2b)
3a(12-2b) -> 3(2) (12-2x3)
6(12-6)
6(6)
=36
4.) 2a-c/b
2a-c/b -> 2(2)-5/3
4-5/3
=1/3
5.) 3abc
3abc-> 3x2x3x5
=90
Answer: -5+8 because the difference (-) of -5 and 8 is 8 - (- 5) which can also be expressed as -5+8. All that matters is that 5 stays negative and 8 stays positive.
Answer: The answer is the first choice ( >)
Step-by-step explanation: 4.3 × 10⁶ = 4300000 . 12.1 × 10⁵ = 1210000 . So 4300000 is greater than 1210000 . HOPE IT HELPS YOU . PLEASE GIVE BRAINLIEST . THANKS .
XPY is the circumference minus XY
the angle of arc XY is 90 degrees
a full revolution of a circle is 360 degrees
the distance XY is 1/4 of the circumference of the circle
the circumference of a circle is C=2 pi r
r is 10m
the circumference is 20 pi
1/4 of 20 is 5
the distance of arc XY is 5 pi
20pi - 5 pi = 15 pi
5) The relation between intensity and current appears linear for intensity of 300 or more (current = intensity/10). For intensity of 150, current is less than that linear relation would predict. This seems to support the notion that current will go to zero for zero intensity. Current might even be negative for zero intensity since the line through the points (300, 30) and (150, 10) will have a negative intercept (-10) when current is zero.
Usually, we expect no output from a power-translating device when there is no input, so we expect current = 0 when intensity = 0.
6) We have no reason to believe the linear relation will not continue to hold for values of intensity near those already shown. We expect the current to be 100 for in intensity of 1000.
8) Apparently, times were only measured for 1, 3, 6, 8, and 12 laps. The author of the graph did not want to extrapolate beyond the data collected--a reasonable choice.
