The answer that I have for this question is A
Answer:
I'm pretty sure the answer is... It is the role of the courts to interpret and apply the law, and the Constitution is the highest law. This all ties back to judicial review where the courts can label something unconstitutional also ties back to checks and balances where each branch has a specific power and job.
Answer:
Citizens can replace the leader if he or she does not meet the citizens' needs
Explanation:
This is because in a dictatorship you cannot replace the leader as he/she has total control over everything in the country.
Answer:
Negative reinforcement
Explanation:
Negative reinforcement can be defined as the acts or behaviour carried out by person in order to encourage someone to do what he /she said.
Negative reinforcement are often use to encourage or motivate someone and as well change the person behaviour. It also strengthened a person behaviour by removing negative result.
This example "Elton's mother has been nagging that he should practice at the piano for the upcoming competition. Elton eventually complies to stop her nagging" simply illustrates NEGATIVE REINFORCEMENT because Elton's mother was nagging in order to encourage Elton's to practice the piano for the upcoming competition and as well change is behaviour in which Elton finally complies to do what she said due to her nagging.
<u>Answer:
</u>
The headline is an example of the conflict caused by states administering elections while federal law protects voting rights.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- Different states have different requirements for the voters to be eligible for voting, but the federal laws unequivocally grant voting rights to everyone above eighteen years of age.
- The conduct and operations of elections are in the hands of the executive, but they do not have the right to modify the rules set for the conduct of elections by the United States Constitution.
- This disparity gives rise to conflict between the state machineries and federal laws.
