Answers:
1. Three problems associated with alcohol
a. High blood pressure
b. Liver and kidney disease or cancer
c. Heart diseases
2. “The direct answer to this question is that the government does not decide the legal status of drugs based on scientific assessment of potential for harm.
The ranking of drugs is a very interesting and controversial topic (subject to the apples and oranges problem), but it is simply not the basis by which governments make these decisions. The chart is worth analyzing, but it won't answer the question.
Practically speaking, making alcohol illegal is untenable. It was attempted in the United states in the 1920s, and I am not aware of any credible historians that consider prohibition to have been a success. Alcohol use has been present amongst humankind for millennia. It spans society, race, social class, etc. It does certainly present great potential for harm, individually through the detrimental health effects of abuse, and societally through the impact of impaired decision making, most notably drunk driving.
Despite that, alcohol also clearly provides some benefits that drive some people to use it. Others choose not to use it at all. Many use it without issue, and some develop problems. It is an effective social lubricant. In many cultures it is a common component of traditional celebrations, and in some cultures it is even a component of formal business interactions. It is one of the central rituals in the Catholic church.
Many of the problems associated with alcohol use can be reasonably mitigated without blanket prohibition, i.e. drunk driving and age restrictions. Many of the problems are also solved through basic social structures, in which friends and family address issues independently.
Given the above, the clear follow-on question is why these other, less harmful, drugs are illegal? If alcohol has demonstrated that it is actually more effective to manage these problems with regulation, how are other legalization decisions being made?
Those are much more complicated questions. The brief answers have to do with legacy (less history of widespread human use with other chemicals) and institutional racism.”
This is from the web so find details that will helped you and make sure to paraphrase!!
If helped mark me the brainiest!!
Hi there!
The correct answer to this question will be "Remove yourself from the situation"
All of the other options for this question won't fit and are not the best thing to do in this situation.
Hope this helped!~
Leisure time activities
Explanation:
1. Sedentary activities:
Intensity level: Less than 3.0 METS
Energy spent: Less than 3.5 kcal/min
- Casual leisure walking
- Bicycling at 5mph
- Fishing
- Stretching exercise
- Slow dancing
2. Medium activities:
Intensity level: 3.0 to 6.0 METS
Energy spent: 3.5 to 7 kcal/min
- Walking at moderate speed of 3 to 4.5 mph
- Leisure roller skating
- Dancing including mild aerobic, line, ballroom folk dancing etc.
- Playing softball
- Moderate leisure activities like trampoline jumping
3. Vigorous activities:
Intensity level: More than 6.0 METS
Energy spent: More than 7 kcal/min
- Racewalking, jogging, running
- Bicycling at 10 mph
- High impact dancing like aerobic, step dancing
- Martial arts like karate, judo
- Playing football, basketball etc
Answer:
mental wellness
Explanation:
this is good for your mental wellbeing so your brain doesnt get overwhelmed by the amount of work you are doing so being persistent with breaks are good.
