Answer:
The correct answer is: A heretical point of view.
Explanation:
The heretical point of view can be clearly explain from a religious point, as heresy could be explain as something against the church beliefs. In the case of John, he thinks it would be an evasion not to accomplish with the purposes of the enterprise in the market. That is to say, he is talking about the opposite of what he believes it should happen for the benefit of the company.
Answer: Char is d. thinking critically
Explanation:
What is critical thinking?
Critical thinking means you evaluate every information objectively in order to make a logical judgement with tangible reasons. This means you evaluate the sources from where the information was found , you scrutinize and examine the facts,observable results and all the findings.
People who can think critically are able to make reasonable judgements and conclusions from any given information and they can differentiate between what is useful information and what is not for them to come to a decision or resolve an issue.
Chat exercises further analysis the information from his friend in order to eliminate any biases and that is critical thinking.
Answer:
One of the ways that the government can become a consumer is that in its construction projects, they are dependent on manufacturers of cement, gravels, and others. There are still lots and lots of examples of this. Then, a way that it becomes the producer is when it lets the citizens pay for all the permits. They produce the permits and actually earn money from it. They use this money for different projects.
Explanation:
I think it would be B as it has to do with physical property
Answer:
Linda Tripp, who died Wednesday at age 70, was one of those people. She wanted to write a book about her life as a secretary in the White House for two presidents: George H.W. Bush, whom she adored, and Bill Clinton, who she thought was crass and immoral. She believed that she could write a book exposing Clinton’s infidelities and that history would remember her as a truth-teller and a whistleblower.
Instead, she became a supporting player in Clinton’s impeachment, stuck forever in the role of the duplicitous harpy who betrayed then-White House intern Monica Lewinsky by secretly recording their conversations.“Central casting couldn’t have cast a better villain,” she told the podcast “Slow Burn” in 2018. “The entire country had decided who I was, and it was evil incarnate.”
Obituary: Linda Tripp, whose taped calls with Lewinsky led to Clinton impeachment
Unfair? Of course it’s unfair. History is a narrative written by the winners, and Clinton was acquitted and thrived. Thanks, in part, to the #MeToo movement, Lewinsky has been able to transform her image from oversexed intern to a more accurate and nuanced characterization: a naive young woman swept up in an affair with a powerful man — in fact, the most powerful man in the world.
Explanation:
