Answer: People's opinions and structure. It changed the way monarchy ran.
Explanation: Rhetoric spread because politicians used it in their work and speeches. Found on quizlet
The correct answer would be option A, Area residents.
The state of Florida funds a program to recruit scholars and researchers to reduce pollutants in the Everglades and restore endangered species. Over time, area residents benefit from cleaner water resources as well as unique ecosystem. Area residents represents the free riders in this example.
Explanation:
Free riders, as the name suggests, are the people who take advantage of the things free of cost. People who take benefits of something without putting any effort or without paying for it, are called the free riders.
In the given example, The state of Florida wants to reduce the pollutants in the everglades and restore the endangered species. For this, they funded a program to recruit scholars and researchers. As a result of their work to reduce the pollutants and restore the species, the unique ecosystem came to existence and the cleaner water supply was made possible. So these were the things from which the Area residents were benefited. So here Area residents acts as Free Riders.
Learn more about Free Riders at:
brainly.com/question/8831819
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer:
the spotlight effect
Explanation:
The spotlight effect is the thought which clicks in the mind of the person who assumes that they are noticed extensively by other people. This implies that the person feels himself to be at the center of the world where everyone notices every action of the person. Such type of effect is noticed when the person does any activity which is very unusual and uncommon.
Question:
Why do you think Lincoln didn't end slavery in the north?
Answer:
The proclamation didn't end slavery because it didn't affect the border slave states that weren't in rebellion, and it had no immediate effect in most of the deep South because, at least on the day it was issued, the slaves were in territory still controlled by the Confederacy.
Explanation:
Abraham Lincoln did believe that slavery was morally wrong, but there was one big problem: It was sanctioned by the highest law in the land, the Constitution. The nation’s founding fathers, who also struggled with how to address slavery, did not explicitly write the word “slavery” in the Constitution, but they did include key clauses protecting the institution, including a fugitive slave clause and the three-fifths clause, which allowed Southern states to count enslaved people for the purposes of representation in the federal government.
In a three-hour speech in Peoria, Illinois, in the fall of 1854, Lincoln presented more clearly than ever his moral, legal and economic opposition to slavery—and then admitted he didn’t know exactly what should be done about it within the current political system.
Abolitionists, by contrast, knew exactly what should be done about it: Slavery should be immediately abolished, and freed enslaved people should be incorporated as equal members of society. They didn’t care about working within the existing political system, or under the Constitution, which they saw as unjustly protecting slavery and enslavers. Leading abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison called the Constitution “a covenant with death and an agreement with Hell,” and went so far as to burn a copy at a Massachusetts rally in 1854.
-Alan Becker
