Answer:
True
Explanation:
Work zone speed limits are usually lower than the initial speed limit. This speed limit is the highest you may drive within the area. While workers are not present, law enforcement are. Fines still apply and may be doubled.
Don't be stupid get a job or something. My mom would beat me with a belt.
Three judges sit on appeals courts, which do not employ juries. Whether or not the law was correctly applied in the trial court is something that the appellate court must decide.
The power of a court to rehear or reconsider a case determined by a lower court is referred to as appellate jurisdiction. The Supreme Court and High Courts of India both have appellate authority. They have the power to either reverse or sustain lower court rulings. To ensure that the proceedings were fair and the appropriate law was applied correctly, appellate courts examine the processes and rulings made by the trial court. The U.S. Supreme Court, the highest appellate court in the country, only considers appeals with significant weight and significance. There must be fundamental distinctions between trial and appellate courts, general and limited jurisdiction courts, and criminal and civil courts.
Learn more about appellate court here
brainly.com/question/29615850
#SPJ4
Answer to this question is no other than C. Am I carrying money
The positivist thesis does not say that law’s merits are unintelligible, unimportant, or peripheral to the philosophy of law. It says that they do not determine whether laws or legal systems exist. Whether a society has a legal system depends on the presence of certain structures of governance, not on the extent to which it satisfies ideals of justice, democracy, or the rule of law. What laws are in force in that system depends on what social standards its officials recognize as authoritative; for example, legislative enactments, judicial decisions, or social customs. The fact that a policy would be just, wise, efficient, or prudent is never sufficient reason for thinking that it is actually the law, and the fact that it is unjust, unwise, inefficient or imprudent is never sufficient reason for doubting it. According to positivism, law is a matter of what has been posited (ordered, decided, practiced, tolerated, etc.). Austin thought the thesis “simple and glaring”. While it is probably the dominant view among analytically inclined philosophers of law, it is also the subject of competing interpretations together with persistent criticisms and misunderstandings.
