The answer to this question would be: <span>-$1,700
In this question, we can separate the account into positive/debit and negative/credit value. The positive/debit value should be:
Joaquin has $1,300 in the bank
He has $4,000 worth of investment
Total positive value = $1300 + $4000= $5300
The negative value should be
</span><span>$7,000 worth of credit card debt
</span>Total positive value =$7000
<span>
Then the net worth should be: $5300 - $7000= -$1700</span>
One
RemarkThis is very complicate unless you pick the right method. It's very handy o know about substitutions.
MethodLet z = (k + 2)^2
Now the problem becomes
z + 16/z = 92 Multiply through by z
Solutionz^2 + 16 = 92z
That does not look very promising. If you know the quadratic formula, this mess can be solved. If you do not know what the quadratic formula is, then what I've written is the answer.
Worse yet, you have to know what complex numbers are. Is this something you know about? The z form of this equation is fine. It gives answers that are rational. The problem is that both are negative and so in your next step, you will be forced to take the square root of a negative number.
Maybe the answer is just
(x + 3)^ + 16 = 92(x + 3)^2
If all you have to do is expand this then you get
x^2 + 6x + 9 + 16 = 92(x^2 + 6x + 9) Remove the brackets.
x^2 + 6x + 25 = 92x^2 + 552x + 828 Put the left over to the right.
0 = 92x^2 - x^2 + 552x - 6x + 828 - 25
0 = 91x^1 + 546x + 803
It looks that way from the second question. If I'm wrong about that, put a comment down below.
Two Put over a common denominator and expand
This is because of there different marketing statargies plus the reason behind this can be because they have high stock left and they want to clear that
1. Answer (D). By the law of sines, we have
in any 
2. Answer (C). The law of cosines,
accepts up to three sides and an angle as an input.
3. Answer (D). Although this triangle is right, we are not given enough information to uniquely determine its sides and angles - here, we need either one more side or one more angle.
4. Answer (D). Don't get tripped up by answer choice (C) - this is just a rearrangement of the statement of the law of cosines. In choice (D), the signs of
and
are reversed.
5. Answer (B). By the law of sines, we have
Solving gives
Note that this is the <em>ambiguous (SSA) case</em> of the law of sines, where the given measures could specify one triangle, two triangles, or none at all!
6. Answer (A). Since we know all three sides and none of the angles, starting with the law of sines will not help, so we begin with the law of cosines to find one angle; from there, we can use the law of sines to find the remaining angles.