Answer:
The criticism is true to a certain degree, and unjustified to another degree.
Explanation:
It is true in the sense that the U.S. has indeed lost a lot of manufacturing to Mexico, simply because Mexico has far lower labor costs, and U.S. manufacturers have decided to take advantage of that by taking their plants to Mexican states.
It is also true that Mexico has been running a trade surplus with the United States in recent years, mainly because of the large manufacturing sector that Mexico has been developing.
On the other hand, the criticism is unjustified because neither a trade deficit nor the moving of manufacturing to Mexico mean that the United States as a whole is in worst condition than before NAFTA. In fact, most economists agree that free trade is a good thing for the economy as a whole, and that most people benefit from the lower costs and specialization that trade brings about.
The problem lies then, in the people who lose their jobs: formerly unionized manufacturing workers from the Rust Belt, for example. These people need to be helped with government assitance, both in terms of welfare, and training, so that they can find new jobs and make ends meet in the meanwhile.
<span>If I purchased 1,300 shares of lakeside bank stock for $23.32 a share. The total worth of the share is 1, 300 * 23.32 = $30, 316. Okay I received payments dividend worth 0.61 a share; that becomes 0.61 * 23.32 = $14.2252. I sold 1, 300 shares for $24.32. So I sold it for 1, 300 * 24.32 = $31616.
My total return = (Amount I sold the share + dividend received) - Amount I bought the share. So we have (31616 + 14.2552) - 30316 = $31630.2552 - $ 30, 316 = $1314.2552</span>
Answer:
See attached picture.
Explanation:
See attached picture for explanation.
Answer:
The correct option is increase; decrease; increase
Explanation:
First, we will define the following terms:
- Consumer surplus
- Producer surplus
- Total surplus
<u>Consumer surplus</u> refers to the difference between the price that consumers pay and the price that they are willing to pay. Consumer surplus always increases as the price of a good falls and decreases as the price of a good rises. Therefore, in this scenario, as the country exports wheat, more wheat will be available in the market, leading to a fall in price, thereby leading to an increase in consumer surplus.
<u>Producer surplus</u> refers to the difference between how much a producer would be willing to accept for given quantity of a good against how much they can receive by selling the good at the market price. The difference or surplus amount is the benefit the producer receives for selling the good in the market. When prices rise, producer surplus increases, and when price falls, producer surplus decreases. There a decrease in price spurred by more wheat in the market will lead to a decrease in producer surplus.
<u>Total surplus</u> in a market refers to the measure of the total well-being of all participants in a market. Therefore, with more wheat in the market, there will be a drop in price, and consumers will be able to buy more, leading to more supply. This will lead to an increase in total surplus.
