Answer:
the answer is the 2nd one.
Explanation:
I believe this because not only is France powerless but Italy is on the other side of France and if the french revolted Italy could help Germany.
Answer:
Groups use varied methods to try to achieve their aims including lobbying, media campaigns, publicity stunts, polls, research, and policy briefings.
If you are declared guilty of a crime without being given a trial, you can state congress has given you :
Habeas Corpus
hope this helps
The word philosophy comes from the Greek word "philos" (love) and "sophia<span>" (wisdom). This literally means love for wisdom. The nature of philosophy </span>are<span> the following:</span>
1. It analyzes the foundations of the other disciplines.
2. It attempts to prosper the comprehensive conception or apprehension of the world.
3. I<span>t </span><span>studies </span>and<span> evaluates critically the beliefs and attitudes of human beings, especially those that are often considered as uncritical.</span>
4. It investigates the rules of language and its principles. It attempts to explain the meaning of vague words and concepts.<span> </span>
not sure if this helps but I hope it does
sorry its so long
To date erosion scientists have failed to address — or have addressed inadequately — some of the ‘big questions’ of our discipline. For example, where is erosion occurring? Why is it happening, and who is to blame? How serious is it? Who does it affect? What should be the response? Can we prevent it? What are the costs of erosion? Our inability or reluctance to answer such questions damages our credibility and is based on weaknesses in commonly-used approaches and the spatial and temporal scales at which much research is carried out. We have difficulty in the recognition, description and quantification of erosion, and limited information on the magnitude and frequency of events that cause erosion. In particular there has been a neglect of extreme events which are known to contribute substantially to total erosion. The inadequacy and frequent misuse of existing data leaves us open to the charge of exaggeration of the erosion problem (a la Lomborg).
Models need to be developed for many purposes and at many scales. Existing models have proved to be of limited value, in the real as opposed to the academic world, both because of problems with the reliability of their results, and difficulties (with associated costs) of acquiring suitable data. However, there are some positive signs: models are now being developed for purposes including addressing questions of off-site impacts and land-use policy. Cheap, reliable and technically simple methods of erosion assessment at the field scale are needed. At the global scale, an up-date of GLASOD based on a scientific approach is urgent so that we are at least able to identify erosion ‘hotspots’.
In terms of explanation of erosion, the greatest need is for a full recognition of the importance of socio-economic drivers. The accession of new countries to the EU with different economic and land-use histories emphasises this need. Too often we have left people, especially the farmers, out of the picture. Our approach could be characterised as ‘data-rich and people-poor’.
