Answer: a. increased paperwork at every step of the shipping process.
Explanation:
There is no excerpt attached but this should be the answer.
Having five different factories in China means that Holden Outwear would have to transport things to and fro all five factories including raw materials, intermediate goods and finished goods.
This represents a lot of shipping and shipping comes with paperwork. It would therefore be no surprise if the Holden Outwear is having to go through the bane of increased paperwork for manufacturing at five different factories.
Answer:
Organization is arranging or coordinating especially in a business, society, or association aspect. Examples of organization could be:
1. Arranging a group of people who work in specific studies
2. Taking books by their genre, and putting them together
3. The economic pyramid, is the perfect example of an organization. Defining society by class.
Answer:
Explanation:
These are the 2 ways to use provider credit:
1. Through linking reimbursement checks in bank deposit. These checks are from the vendor and will be used to create a vendor credit.
2. Making payment of supplier invoices, is another way to use credit, to carry out this, I have to create the invoice.
Answer:
The price elasticity of demand is 1.14.
The price is Elastic.
Elasticity is more than one so total revenue will fall.
Explanation:
Given the initial price of good x = $12
Final price of good x = $12.90
% change in price = [(12.90 - 12) / 12] x 100 = 7.5 %
Initial quantity = 5000
Final quantity = 4600
% change in quantity = [(4600 - 5000)/5000] x 100 = -8%
Elasticity = % change in quantity / % change in price
Elasticity = 8% / 7%
Elasticity = 1.14
The price elasticity of demand is 1.14.
The price is Elastic.
Since elasticity is more than one so total revenue will fall.
Answer:
The correct answer is Inductive reasoning.
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is a form of reasoning in which the truth of the premises supports the conclusion, but does not guarantee it. A classic example of inductive reasoning is:
- All the crows observed so far have been black
- Therefore, all crows are black
In principle, it could be that the next crow observed is not black. In contrast to deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning has the advantage of being expansive, that is, the conclusion contains more information than is contained in the premises. Given its expansive nature, inductive reasoning is very useful and frequent in science and in everyday life. However, given its fallible nature, its justification is problematic. When are we justified in making an inductive inference, and concluding, for example, that all crows are black from a limited sample of them? What distinguishes a good inductive argument from a bad one? These and other related problems give rise to the problem of induction, whose validity and importance has continued for centuries.
