Answer:
Without cafeteria plan Karen taxable income is 2250 dollars and with cafeteria plan the taxable income is $2135.
Without cafeteria plan Katie taxable income is 2075 dollars and with cafeteria plan the taxable income is $1960.
Explanation:
A married women Karen earns = $2250
Katie single women earn = $2075
Employee contribution to health care = $115
If the Karen decline to participate in the cafeteria then her taxable income is $2250 (wages).
If the Karen accept to participate in the cafeteria then her taxable income is $2250 - $115 (contribution) = $2135
If Katie declined to participate in the cafeteria then her taxable income is $2075 (wages).
If Katie accept to participate in the cafeteria then her taxable income is $2075 - $115 (contribution) = $1960
Address is the correct answer
Answer:
Please see attached.
Explanation:
a. Calculate earnings per share EPS under each of the three economic scenarios
a.2 Calculate the percentage changes in earnings per share EPS for economic expansion, or recession.
b-i calculate economic per share EPS, under each of the three economic scenarios after recapitalisation.
b-2 calculate the percentage changes in EPS when the economy enters or expand a recession assuming no recapitalisation occurred.
Please find attached detailed solution to the above questions.
Answer: A. She believes the company has become riskier, and therefore increases her required rate of return for the stock.
Explanation:
The formula for the Constant dividend growth model of valuing stock is:
<em>= Next dividend / (Required return - growth rate)</em>
From the formula above, one can tell that if the required return is higher, it would result in a lower value for stock because it would divide the numerator more.
If the analyst believes that the company is riskier and increases the required return, the value would therefore reduce if other measures are kept constant.
