Answer:
About 300 dollars
Step-by-step explanation:
THe best estimate for week one is 300, because 96 rounds to 100, and 100 * 3 equals 300.
The best estimate for week 2 is 600, because 204 rounds to 200, and 200 * 3 equals 600.
600 - 300 = 300, therefore the difference is about 300 dollars.
Hope this helps!
Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.
Answer:
A linear pair is a pair of angles that share a side and a base. In other words, they are the two angles created along one line when two lines intersect. Linear pairs are always supplementary.
The answer is 3 at least thats what ive learned
