Answer:
b) -4
Step-by-step explanation:
Well your at 2 and going to -2 so on a number line you be going back or left.
Going two left gets you to zero and going two more get you -2. So in total you went back four and that be represented as -4.
F(x) is vertically stretched by a factor of 5/4 matches w/ f(x)-5/4
f(x) reflects the x axis matches w/ -f(x)
f(x) is translated 5/4 units up matches with f(x)+5/4
f(x) translated 5/4 to the left matches w/ f(x)-5/4
I didn't really know about this one but it seemed kind of easy, what was your first guesses and did you forget to put one more or was the question like that.
Hope this is right :) or if someone else has a different answer but in the meantime, good luck :)
Answer:
1.) 25
2.)81
3.)49
Step-by-step explanation:
(I recommend getting a Texas instruments TI-84 you can just plug in the numbers and it does it for you :)
Answer:
In a nutshell,
is not equivalent to
.
Step-by-step explanation:
Now we proceed to demonstrate that Edgar's statement is false:
1)
Given
2)
Modulative property/Existence of multiplicative inverse
3)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/736cc/736cc102b00a08b45037c6feb9fa5c48c49cec50" alt="\frac{a}{b}\times \frac{c}{d} = \frac{a\cdot b}{c\cdot d}"
4)
Modulative property/Existence of multiplicative inverse
5)
/Result
In a nutshell,
is not equivalent to
.
For #1, I have attached the number line.
For #2, I have provided two examples. One shows a different any quality symbol, and the other one shows the same based on absolute values.
For #3, you can see using the number line that -0.5 is the closest to zero.