All categories

4 years ago

Demonstrate how workplace discrimination undermines organizational effectiveness.

Business

1 answer:

snow_lady [41]4 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Workplace discrimination prevents the firm from using the full potential of those employees that are being discriminated against.

Explanation:

For example, if the firm discriminates against a specific group of people when hiring (for example, it can discriminate against older people), the firm could lose valuable potential employees that could have provided great skill and experience for the firm.

If the firm practices discrimination against employees, the operation in the company will not be as streamlined as it could be against discrimination because those who are being treated poorly will be less motivated and have lesser output.

You might be interested in

Those who pay off their credit balances in full each month and avoid the finance and interest charges are known as convenience u

beks73 [17]

The answer is true ..

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Assume this process continues, with each successive loan deposited into a checking account and no banks keeping any excess reser

zimovet [89]

Answer:

$2,500,000

Explanation:

Following the stated assumptions in the question, the money multiplier will be used to calculate the resulting effect of the $500,000 injection into the money supply.

The money multiplier formula is 1/r , where r is the required reserve ratio. So, the resulting change in demand deposits is:

Change in Demand Deposits = Change in Fresh Reserves (that is, the Initial Deposit)×1/r

= $500,000×1/0.20

=$500,000 × 5

= $2,500,000

6 0

4 years ago

Read the section "The Effect of Price on Number of Suppliers." What support does the reading give for the idea that the music in

uranmaximum [27]

The effect of the demand and supply chain can be seen in the highly volatile nature of the music industry.

Explanation:

The principles are highly accurate for many industries that are given in the article "The Effect of Price on Number of Suppliers."

This is effectively about the demand and supply chain and one can see how this applies to the people in the music industry who have to deal with these overhauls.

The industry is largely volatile and there are trends that come and go in a couple of years and with them go away whole labels and and artist.

The people who survive are the ones that adapt and do not go all in on one trend or another.

This one can even see in other business practices.

5 0

3 years ago

Jane is the manager of a local bank branch in College Station where he consumes bundles of two commodities x and y. Prices in Co

Sholpan [36]

Answer:

Remain the same

Explanation:

$U(x,y) = xy^{2}$ ......................................................... (1)

ICS = Income in College Station = $6,000

CSpx = Price of x in College Station = 1

CSpy = Price of y in College Station = 5

ID = Income in Dallas = ?

Dpx = Price of x in Dallas = 4

Dpy = Price of y in Dallas = 5

Step 1

Assume that Jane always divides his income in College Station equally into two, i.e. $3,000 each, to buy x and y, the quantities of x and y he can buy in College Station can be calculated by dividing the $3,000 by the prices of x and y. This is calculated as follows:

CSqx = Quantity of x in College Station = $3,000 ÷ 1

= 3,000 units

CSqy = Quantiy of y in College Station = 3,000 ÷ 5

= 600 units

Jane's utility in College Station can be calculated by amending equation (1) and substituting 3,000 units for x and 600 units for y as follows:

$CSU(CSqx,CSqy) = (CSqx.CSqy^{2})$

$CSU(3000,600) = (3000*600^{2})$

= 3,000 * 360,000

CSU(3000, 600) = 1,080,000,000 utils .......................... (2)

Step 2

Since Jane is guaranteed a salary in Dallas with which he would be able to buy exactly what he buys in College Station, this implies that the salary in Dallas will make him to be able to buy 3,000 units of good x and 600 units of good which he currently buys in College Station.

Since

CSpx = 1, which is less than Dpx = 4

But

CSpy = 5, is equal to Dpy = 5

We need to calculate how much his Income will increase in Dallas to be able to buy 3,000 units of good x in Dallas given that its price is $4. Therefore, his income will increase by multiplying $4 by 3000 units and deduct $3,000 he was spending in College Station on x as follows:

IID = Increase in Income in Dallas = (3,000 * $4) - $3,000

= $12,000 - $3,000

= $9,000

Therefore, ID (Income in Dallas) is the addition of IDD and ICS (Income in College Station) calculated as:

ID = IID + ICS

= $9,000 + $6,000

= $15,000

Conclusion

With the ID of $15,000, Jane will be spending $12,000 to buy 3,000 units of good x in Dallas and continue to spend $3,000 to buy 600 units of good y in Dallas.

This will make Jan's utility in Dallas (DU) to be equal to 1,080,000,000 utils as obtained in equation (2) above.

Therefore, Jane's utility will remain the same based on the tangency rule which states that a consumer will choose a combination of two goods at which an indifference curve is tangent to the budget line, i.e. his income.

5 0

3 years ago

Mike and Molly really like their financial institution. They are part-owners of the institution and appreciate the great custome

Rzqust [24]

Answer: Credit Union

Explanation:

Mike and Molly are making use of a credit union type of financial institution.

A credit union type of financial institution makes use of money of joint members deposited to give loans to members within the same group. The money they credit to members within the group is the money that would have been profit to other group members. So, instead of taking their profit home individually, they are given out on loan to members within the group. The purpose of this credit loan type of financial institution is to encourage members to save and to easily access loans.

7 0

4 years ago