Answer: I think it is an acute triangle.
Step-by-step explanation:
The theorem that justifies why triangles ABC and DEF are congruent is: HL.
<h3>What is the Hypotenuse-Leg Congruence Theorem (HL)?</h3>
The hypotenuse-leg congruence theorem (HL) states that if two triangles that are right triangles have a pair of congruent hypotenuse and a pair of corresponding congruent legs, then both right triangles are proven to be congruent to each other. This means both right triangles are have the same shape and size.
Given that:
angle ABC = angle DEF = 90° (congruent right angles, this means both triangles are right triangles)
AC = FD (a pair of congruent hypotenuse)
AB = DE (a pair of congruent legs)
Thus, we can conclude that since triangle ABC and triangle DEF have a pair of congruent hypotenuses and a pair of congruent legs, therefore, the two right triangles, triangle ABC and triangle DEF are congruent to each other by the HL congruent theorem.
Thus, the theorem that justifies why both triangles are congruent is: HL.
Learn more about the HL congruence theorem on:
brainly.com/question/2102943
#SPJ1
Answer:
The thousands place
Kalutasan:
(Isinalin mula sa English. Pasensya na sa hindi magandang grammar ko)
libong lugar
Answer:
Please find the answer in the explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
RULER
measurements taken by ruler can be limited due to absolute errors, zero error and uncertainties.
1.) If the end of the ruler is worn out giving rise to a zero error
2.) The calibration of the ruler may give rise to another systematic error if the makings are incorrect.
3.) If the object to be measured is not on the same level as graduated surface of the ruler, the angle at which the scale is viewed will affect the result. This is known as parallax error.
SCALE
Systematic error can occur in a scale when the scale is wrongly calibrated.
Also, reading a scale from different angles introduces a variable parallax error.
random uncertainty could be a parallax error caused by taking readings from different angles. This can be reduced by the use of a mirror behind the scale and viewing normally.
26,300 = 1/2x + 3200......with x being last years population
