Answer:
1. 12
2. Multiply
3. 27
Step-by-step explanation:
These make the most sense because you are supposedly trying to find factors of 12, that multiply to 27. It can't be negative numbers I don't think. And there can't be factors of 27 that multiply to 12.
I'm so sorry if this is incorrect, but I hope it helps!
2004 was a leap year so 29/366=7.9%
Answer:
The given two triangles are not congruent.
Step-by-step explanation:
See the diagram of the two triangles attached to this question.
The third angle of the second triangle is [180° - (31° + 124°)] = 180° - 155° = 25°.{Since the other two angles of the triangle are 31° and 124°}
Now, for the first triangle, the values of the adjacent angles of the side with length 6 are 45° and 31°, but for the second triangle, the values of the adjacent angles of the side with length 6 are 25° and 31°.
Therefore, two triangles do not satisfy the Angle=Side-Angle i.e. ASA criteria to become congruent.
So, the given two triangles are not congruent. (Answer)
Look at the 119. Would you say this is closer to 200 or 100? The answer is 22100. You just have to isolate what you are really looking at.
