No, because (2,0) is a coordinate. x=2 and y=0. So just plug in the numbers where there's x or y with the appropriate number, (2 or 0). So in the first equation, x-2y=0, when you pug in the numbers, 2-2(0)=0, you know it's wrong because 2-0=0 isn't correct. So no. the point (2,0) is not a solution to the first equation. Now plug in the numbers for the second coordinate. You get 2(2)-3(0)=1. So 4-0=1. This is once again false no no. (2,0) satisfies neither equations.
We are given : Cost of a gallon of milk = $2.50.
Cost of a cup of yogurt = $1.20.
Total money Monica has = $20.
Number of cups of yogurt Monica can buy = x.
And inequality made is also correct
1.20x + 2.5 ≤ 20.
Now, we need to solve it for x.
Subtracting 2.5 from both sides, we get
1.20x + 2.5 -2.5 ≤ 20 - 2.5.
1.20x ≤ 17.5
Dividing both sides by 1.20, we get
1.20x/1.20 ≤ 17.5/1.20.
x ≤ 14.5833...
Because it's less than 15, so final answer is : 14 is greatest number of cups of yogurt Monica can buy.
1 right angle because if it has 2 then the sum of the angles is already 180 wihtout the 3rd angle.
30 divided by 4 equals 7.5 or you could round it up to eight if the answer is supposed to have only one digit.
