Why is tikto* a cool app

The following transactions relate to the City of Middleton, which has a fiscal year end of December 31. The city adopts budgets

scoundrel [369]

Answer:

See explaination

Explanation:

1.

--Capital projects fund journal

Dr. Cash $2,000,000

Cr. Other Financing Source—Proceeds of Bonds $2,000,000

--Governmental activities journal

Dr. Cash $2,000,000

Cr. Bonds Payable $2,000,000

2.

--Debt service fund journal

Dr. Estimated Other Financing Sources—Inter fund Transfers In $ 30,000

Cr. Appropriations $ 30,000

--General Fund journal

Dr. Budgetary Fund Balance $ 30,000

Cr. Estimated Other Financing Uses—Inter fund Transfers Out $ 30,000

3.

--Capital projects fund journal

Dr. Investments $1,000,000

Cr. Cash $1,000,000

--Governmental activities journal

Dr. Investments $1,000,000

Cr. Cash $1,000,000

4.

--General Fund journal

Dr. Other Financing Uses—Inter fund Transfer out $ 30,000

Cr. Cash $ 30,000

--Debt service fund journal

a) Dr. Cash $ 30,000

Cr. Other Financing Sources—Inter fund Transfer In $ 30,000

b) Dr. Expenditures—Interest $ 30,000

Cr. Cash $ 30,000

--Governmental activities journal

Dr. Expenses—Interest on Long-term Debt $ 30,000

Cr. Cash $ 30,000

5.

--Capital projects fund

Dr. Interest Receivable $ 11,555

Cr. Revenues—(optional to put source, Interest) $ 11,555

--Governmental activities journal

a) Dr. Interest Receivable $ 11,555

Cr. General Revenues—Investment Earnings—(optional to indicate restriction, Restricted for Capital Projects) $ 11,555

b) Expenses—Interest on Long-term Debt $ 30,000

Interest Payable $ 30,000

Debt service fund

Note that there is no accrual of interest expenditure since the expenditure is not legally due until after the first of the year.

4 0

2 years ago

Plush Corporation purchased 100 percent of Common Corporation’s common stock on January 1, 20X3, and paid $450,000. The fair val

Oxana [17]

Answer:

Please refer the detail answer in the memo below

Explanation:

Date: 24 January 20XX

Subject: Review of Impairment of Goodwill

From: External Auditors

To: Chief Accountant, Plush Corporation

Upon review of the investment made by your company in Common Corporation, we believe that there are possible indications of the impairment of the goodwill initially recognized in the books upon acquisition.

At the time of Acquisition:

Consideration = $450,000

Fair Value of Net Assets = $430,000

Goodwill = $450,000 - $430,000 = $20,000

The new guidance issued by FASB, requires only a one-step quantitative impairment test, whereby a goodwill impairment loss will be measured as the excess of a reporting unit’s carrying amount over its fair value.

However, if we follow the previous guidance of FASB, we have to test the impairment with the following three steps:

Step 1: We will compare the carrying amount of the net assets with the Fair value of Reporting Unit, and if the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, we will record the impairment.

Step 1: We will compute, implied value of goodwill by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with the fair value of the identifiable net assets, if FV of net assets are higher, then there is no impairment, otherwise we will jump to Step 3.

Step 3: If the calculated implied value of the goodwill is lower than the actual goodwill at acquisition, than the difference is the impairment loss, however in case the implied value of the goodwill is higher than the actual goodwill at acquisition, no impairment shall be recorded.

Apparently, since the fair value of Common had increased to $485,000, there is no need to recognize the impairment loss on goodwill; however we believe that the estimated fair value of Common is less than the $430,000 and therefore impairment should be recorded.

7 0

2 years ago

The upper class makes up about 25 percent of the population in the United States. True or False

jeyben [28]

Yes that is correct :)

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Iaci Company makes two products from a common input. Joint processing costs up to the split-off point total $42,000 a year. The

eimsori [14]

Questions

Iaci Company makes two products from a common input. Joint processing costs up to the split-off point total $42,000 a year. The company allocates these costs to the joint products on the basis of their total sales values at the split-off point. Each product may be sold at the split-off point or processed further. Data concerning these products appear below: Product X Product Y Total Allocated joint processing costs $22,400 $19,600 $42,000 Sales value at split-off point $32,000 $28,000 $60,000 Costs of further processing $11,600 $25,300 $36,900 Sales value after further processing $44,800 $53,200 $98,000 Required: (a) What is the net monetary advantage (disadvantage) of processing Product X beyond the split-off point?

Answer:

Net advantage from further processing $1,200 

Explanation:

A company should process further a product if the additional revenue from the split-off point is greater than than the further processing cost.

Also note that all the joint costs incurred up to the split-off point are irrelevant to the decision to process further any of the .

Net monetary advantage of product X

$

Sales revenue after the split-off point 44,800

Sales revenue at the split-off point (32,000)

Additional sales revenue 12,800

Further processing cost (11,600)

Net advantage from further processing 1,200

Net advantage from further processing $1,200 

4 0

2 years ago

Explain the result of the violation of patent protection illustrated in the scenario below.

lesya692 [45]

<h2>Luke cannot sell the product because patent is already been issued to the similar product.</h2>

Explanation:

According to the given scenario, Luke though he is an inventor and he has created a product which is similar to already patented, Luke is not allowed to sale based on the patent rule.

Since there is a patent right obtained by someone for similar product, then what Luke is trying to do is against the Patent law.

Luke cannot prove that he already had an idea. Any law always needs a proof than a statement.

Luke may be punishable under the patent law if he tries to sell his invention.

6 0

2 years ago