Personally I'd solve this inequality for y first: y < x-3.
That immediately eliminates (6,2) and (2,6).
Starting from y < x-3 and letting 2 sub for x and -1 sub for y, is the following true or false?
-1 < 2 -3 NO. -1 < -1 is false. Was there a fourth answer choice?
Not sure what you’re asking, but, if you’re looking for the expanded form... hope that helps?
Answer:
7
4
Step-by-step explanation:
The <u>actual values</u> are shown on the given graph as <u>blue points</u>.
The <u>line of regression</u> is shown on the given graph as the <u>red line</u>.
From inspection of the graph, in the year 2000 the actual rainfall was 43 cm, shown by point (2000, 43). It appears that the regression line is at y = 50 when x is the year 2000.
⇒ Difference = 50 - 43 = 7 cm
<u>In 2000, the actual rainfall was </u><u>7</u><u> centimeters below what the model predicts</u>.
From inspection of the graph, in the year 2003 the actual rainfall was 44 cm, shown by point (2003, 40). It appears that the regression line is at y = 40 when x is the year 2003.
⇒ Difference = 44 - 40 = 4 cm
<u>In 2003, the actual rainfall was </u><u>4</u><u> centimeters above what the model predicts.</u>
Answer:
-18.
Step-by-step explanation:
They're both negative numbers being added to each other, so you'd add 6 and 12 (which is 18) and then put a negative sign before the 18. Therefore, your answer is -18.
I hope this helps, have a nice day.
