Each time they assume the sum<span> is </span>rational<span>; however, upon rearranging the terms of their equation, they get a contradiction (that an </span>irrational number<span> is equal to a </span>rational number<span>). Since the assumption that the </span>sum of a rational<span> and </span>irrational number<span> is </span>rational<span>leads to a contradiction, the </span>sum<span> must be </span>irrational<span>.</span>
Answer:I think 11
Step-by-step explanation: 11 because one can do no more than 11 packages so the most potential one most be 11 since it can't do 18 but the 18 can do 11 and the max of the other one is 11
If you don’t know we don’t either but ishebrhd
Answer:
B.
Step-by-step explanation:
If the population, in this case, weights of golden retriever dogs, follows a normal distribution, then the sample will too, even if the sample size is lower than 30. You only have to worry about the sample size being too small when a problem doesn't explicitly say the distribution from which the samples are drawn is normally distributed.
