Answer:
No, Johnson didn't straightforwardly recognize that his choice was situated in morals and profound quality. Johnson said that the video was difficult to watch and the activities in the video didn't speak to Starbucks' Mission and Values (Tangdall, 2018). The topic of morals and profound quality is tended to in Starbucks' Mission and Values, and moral measures; nonetheless, Johnson tended to the issue by implication.
Truly, his expression of remorse advanced the attention to the issue. After the episode, Johnson surrendered that the activities in the didn't speak to Starbucks' Mission and Values. From that point forward, an including situation was made where everyone was required to work inside Starbucks without essentially buying anything. Johnson, in his conciliatory sentiment, concentrated on the activity and caution (Tangdall, 2018).
The statement of regret made a positive distinction. After the conciliatory sentiment, Johnson met the two men that got captured, suggesting that the mindfulness was completely made, and the administration of the association truly implied change (Tangdall, 2018).
For the clients and workers, it had any kind of effect. For the representatives, they had a chance of being prepared on "oblivious predisposition preparing" This made them progressively mindful of what they ought to do on the off chance that they are confronted with problematic. For the clients, a moving and sustaining atmosphere was made where an individual can take tea and pause, simultaneously.
Answer:
The average cost at a caseload of 25 attempted placements per month is 105.
Explanation:
The total cost function given in the question first correctly stated as follows:
TC = 25Q^1/2 + 2,500 ................ (1)
A caseload of 25 attempted placements implies that:
Q = 25
Substitute Q = 25 into equation (1), we have:
TC = (25 * 25^(1/2)) + 2,500 = 2,625
The average cost (AC) can now be calculated as follows:
AC = TC / Q = 2,625 / 25 = 105
Therefore, the average cost at a caseload of 25 attempted placements per month is 105.
Answer
$31,000
Explanation:
(c) $31,000
Explanation:
As per IRS for Earnings of Clergy, A licensed, commissioned, or ordained minister who performs ministerial services as an employee may be able to exclude from gross income the fair rental value of a home provided as part of compensation (a parsonage) or a housing allowance provided as compensation if it is used to rent or otherwise provide a home. In order to be able to exclude the housing allowance from income, the minister's employing organization must officially designate the housing allowance as such before paying it to the minister.The fair rental value of a parsonage or the housing allowance is excludable only for income tax purposes, and not for Self-employment tax purpose.
In the given case, the church did not designate any of Luke's salaries as a housing allowance. Hence it is not deductible from Gross Income for Income Tax Purposes and irrespective of designation or not, it is not deductible for self-employment tax.
Thus, Full salary of Luke i.e $31,000 must be included when figuring net income for self-employment tax.
The company's plantwide overhead rate is calculated to be $38.60 per machine hour.
The company's plantwide overhead rate can be calculated by dividing the sum of overhead costs of indirect labor and factory utilities by the total machine hours planned for the next year. As the overhead cost of indirect labor is $5,240,000 and the overhead cost of factory utilities is $550,000; the plantwide overhead rate can be calculated as follows;
plantwide overhead rate = (overhead cost of indirect labor + overhead cost of factory utilities) ÷ machine hours
plantwide overhead rate = $5,240,000 + $550,000 ÷ 150,000
plantwide overhead rate = 5,790,000 ÷ 150,000
plantwide overhead rate = 38.60
Therefore, the plantwide overhead rate is calculated to be $38.60 per machine hour.
To learn more about overhead rate, click here:
brainly.com/question/24130597
#SPJ4
Answer:
yes, there is no separation between the administration and ownership in a partnership.
the partnership contract stipulates which partners have the decision making ability and which partners don't. We cannot say specifically that limited partners have no say in decision making.
Moreover, the control of the partnership is not based on the amount invested like in corporations. that too is based on the contract. however, in practice, yes if you have more money invested in the business, you have more influence.
Explanation:
