Answer:
1. Option a
2. Option a
3. Population proportion
4. Sample proportion
Step-by-step explanation:
1The entire city of Athens is the:_______
a. population.
2) The 200 citizens from the researcher's data is the:______
a. sample
3) Which symbol would denote the value of 0.378 in this example?
Population proportion- average estimate of those residents in the entire city that are below the poverty line.
4) Which symbol would denote the value of 0.25 in this example?
Sample proportion - the average estimate of the 200 random sample residents that are below the poverty line.
Answer:
Show ΔBCD ≅ ΔGFE, so ∠C ≅ ∠F. Base angle of an isosceles triangle are congruent, so ΔACF is isosceles.
Step-by-step explanation:
Informally, subtract DE from CE and DF. This will show CD ≅ EF.
Then ΔBCD ≅ ΔGFE by the HL theorem for right triangles.
Corresponding parts of congruent triangles are congruent, namely the angles C and F.
Since base angles of ΔACF are congruent, it is isosceles.
Answer:
You can always ask the tutor they give the correct answer :))
9514 1404 393
Answer:
D.
Step-by-step explanation:
The wording "when x is an appropriate value" is irrelevant to this question. That phrase should be ignored. (You may want to report this to your teacher.)
When you look at the answer choices, you see that all of them are negative except the last one (D). When you look at the problem fraction, you see that it is positive.
The only reasonable choice is D.
__
Your calculator can check this for you.
√12/(√3 +3) ≈ 3.4641/(1.7321 +3)
= 3.4641/4.7321 ≈ 0.7321 = -1 +√3
__
If you want to "rationalize the denominator", then multiply numerator and denominator by the conjugate of the denominator. The conjugate is formed by switching the sign between terms.

_____
<em>Additional comment</em>
We "rationalize the denominator" in this way to take advantage of the relation ...
(a -b)(a +b) = a² -b²
Using this gets rid of the irrational root in the denominator, hence "rationalizes" the denominator.
We could also have multiplied by (3 -√3)/(3 -√3). This would have made the denominator positive, instead of negative. However, I chose to use (√3 -3) so you could see that all we did was change the sign from (√3 +3).