when determining who will stay in the jury, the attorneys ask the potential jurors certain questions to determine their competence to serve in the case.That is, whether or not they have the tendency of being biased. Questions are also asked to inquire that the potential juror will not be caused any form of hardship if selected.
Potential jurors are asked about their backgrounds, biases, and any knowledge they have about the case at hand.
Dismissal for cause is done when potential juror is seen as unqualified or unfit to serve in the case while peremptory challenge is when the attorneys reject a number of potential jurors without stating the reason.
The attorney would use the dismissal for cause mechanism if from the voir dire, a candidate appears unqualified. The attorney would choose to use the peremptory challenge if a candidate that appears qualified has the likelihood of favoring the opposing party.
Answer:
Um I dont know but you wanna talk?
Explanation:
Answer:
Both answers to me look like the first option!
Explanation:
Anytime a juror sees any type of literature before a trial about the accused, it will definitely effect how they feel about the accused no matter what the person does to not let it influence their opinion.
The second question will give a consultant the ability to tell the attorneys what type of people to try and get on their jury. For instance, in the OJ Simpson trial, the jury consultant for the defense instructed the defense to pick as many African-American women as possible, as their surveys showed that they were the most sympathetic to Mr. Simpson.
Answer: When america was having a problem with Joe biden and the victim was the people and the defendants was joe biden an his people the arguing on if he should be the president or not.
Explanation: I hope this helped you. Thank you for the question.