No they're not proportional, and it's four*.
4/2 = 2
20/6 = 3.333333333334 or 3 1/3
Answer:
Yea sure.
Step-by-step explanation:
2 and 5. 1 isn't apart of the list because the definition of a prime number is having 1 and itself as a factor. 1 only has the number 1.
Answer:
First graph
Step-by-step explanation:
First off, the graph opens up because <em>a</em><em> </em>is positive. Second, the parent function of the quadratic graph is
and the greater the WHOLE NUMBERS [vertical stretch (<em>a</em>)] get, the slimmer the parabola gets, and the more you increase the DEGREE evenly [anything ending in 0, 2, 4, 6, and\or 8], the more flat, U-shaped the parabola becomes.
I am joyous to assist you anytime.
Card P's balance increased by $3.43 more than Card Q's balance. The accumulated total on Card P over the 4 years is $1080.70 and the accumulated total of Card Q is $1,206.28. Based on the principal outlay however, Card P would have netted a higher interest over Card Q when the principal is subtracted from the accumulated value. (For eg. Card P accumulated value $1080.70 less Principal $726.19 equals $354.51).The interests over the 4 years period would be $354.51 and $351.08 respectively, hence Card P having an increase in balance of $3.43 over Card Q.